Truth about 666, the beast and the seal of beast

End-times discussion of the Book of Revelation. What is the preterist view? Who is the Beast of Revelation? Who is Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38&39?

Truth about 666, the beast and the seal of beast

Postby nickols_k » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:21 am

Peace to you!

I've published the article:
http://my666.boom.ru/666_en.html
This material makes understanding of Revelation more clear
and will help to be saved for many many people and will help to avoid terrible plagues for many other people!
You will not carry any responsibility for this link since this material was signed by me!
But availability of this material is important for now as never before!
Be bless!

Announce:

At the age of thirteen I was thrown into another world by a fateful accident. Clinically pronounced dead, I returned from the afterlife with knowledge rarely glimpsed by the average person. This experience has defined my life as a person with each foot in a different world. Explaining the afterlife to those who have not had a near death experience requires breaking down the illusions that most people hold of what they call "reality". I hope that my experiences can enlighten others while allowing me to share my insights with my fellow humans.

I have received the seal of the beast in afterlife world 20-22 years ago. Main information - the first who meets us in afterlife world is the BEAST which is described in Bible, but not God as many think!
BEAST - this creature has size about 12 meters in height. This creature is able to stay on two legs and has very long tail (so it also 30 meters long including the tail).
IMAGE OF BEAST is any creature who has seal of beast with spirit of beast inside and without man's status!
MARK OF BEAST. After sealing up appears imprint! This imprint has name - mark. It looks like black tattoo which is putted on spirit (not on body) therefore can not be cutted out. It contains the head of dog with iron slam on head.
SEAL OF BEAST. The beast has the seal. It is like iron seal on a long pole. Any host is able to mark by seal of beast.
666 is number of men who will be marked by beast but will be saved!!! (i.e. common number of saved from all who will be marked by beast).
FOREHEAD whole forehead bone from brows up to top of head! The seal of beast is fatal when it putted on forehead or on any hand.
NAME OF THE BEAST. The beast has name, same as any creature who was created by Creator.
NUMBER OF NAME OF THE BEAST is number of people who will call themselves by name of the beast. I.e. 666 is number of people who will be saved from the lake of fire with seal of beast on any place. But the number of name of the beast is number of people who will call themselves same as the beast.
HOST is creature (man or angel) who received the seal of beast!!! Host can to mark up anybody by the seal of beast!
ROD OF IRON is spirit of beast which is inserted into us horizontally.

Image
Last edited by nickols_k on Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

I should probably just delete this, but ...

Postby jcr4runner » Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:32 pm

Someone told me that I ought to just delete this post from the discussion board. But it is actually good example of what happens when people interpret the Bible outside of its historical and literary context.

It also show what happens when dreams and revelations become a standard for interpreting scripture. Scripture itself ought to interpret scripture and not any private interpretation from man.
jcr4runner
Veteran
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Re: I should probably just delete this, but ...

Postby nickols_k » Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:26 am

jcr4runner wrote:Someone told me that I ought to just delete this post from the discussion board. But it is actually good example of what happens when people interpret the Bible outside of its historical and literary context.

Only evil spirit may told to delete link on article with prophecies of God-Father!
It also show what happens when dreams and revelations become a standard for interpreting scripture. Scripture itself ought to interpret scripture and not any private interpretation from man.

Article doesn't contain any private interpretation of scriptures! It has correct interpretation of scriptures!
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

Prophecies? or Fallacies?

Postby jcr4runner » Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:23 am

Are they really prophecies? If so, I agree. But I don't think they are prophecies. If so, we would see others in history with a similar interpretation. Yours is new and it probably isn't true.

- JCR
jcr4runner
Veteran
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Re: Prophecies? or Fallacies?

Postby nickols_k » Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:19 am

jcr4runner wrote:Are they really prophecies? If so, I agree. But I don't think they are prophecies. If so, we would see others in history with a similar interpretation. Yours is new and it probably isn't true.

- JCR

Yes! They are real prophecies of God-Father! simply because article lives in internet since fab 2006

Be bless!
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

Re: I should probably just delete this, but ...

Postby clinevol98 » Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:19 pm

nickols_k wrote:Article doesn't contain any private interpretation of scriptures! It has correct interpretation of scriptures!


no private interpretation of scriptures? as jcr said, no one else has had this same interpretation. you have made this stuff up.

you said: "It looks like black tattoo which is putted on spirit (not on body) therefore can not be cutted out. It contains the head of dog with iron slam on head."

this description of the mark is found nowhere in Scripture. this is a private interpretation that you have fabricated.
clinevol98
Minor League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:45 pm

Re: I should probably just delete this, but ...

Postby nickols_k » Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:43 am

clinevol98 wrote:
nickols_k wrote:Article doesn't contain any private interpretation of scriptures! It has correct interpretation of scriptures!


no private interpretation of scriptures? as jcr said, no one else has had this same interpretation. you have made this stuff up.

you said: "It looks like black tattoo which is putted on spirit (not on body) therefore can not be cutted out. It contains the head of dog with iron slam on head."

this description of the mark is found nowhere in Scripture. this is a private interpretation that you have fabricated.

No! It's fact and the mark of beast looks like black tattoo! Christians are only people who don't know such things!

be bless!
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

Re: I should probably just delete this, but ...

Postby clinevol98 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:08 am

nickols_k wrote:No! It's fact and the mark of beast looks like black tattoo! Christians are only people who don't know such things!

be bless!


you cannot prove this is a fact! what if i told you that God revealed me in a dream that the mark is actually a burger king logo branded on the foreheads of people? i cannot prove that, you cannot prove your assertions; regardless they are private interpretations as jay said!
clinevol98
Minor League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:45 pm

No reply is necessary

Postby jcr4runner » Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:38 pm

This is one of those posts that speaks for itself. The writer is non-rational -- and that is the way that a lot of the world thinks unfortunately. I would try to answer, but like I said it speaks for itself -- for any thinking person.
jcr4runner
Veteran
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Re: No reply is necessary

Postby clinevol98 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:43 pm

jcr4runner wrote:This is one of those posts that speaks for itself. The writer is non-rational -- and that is the way that a lot of the world thinks unfortunately. I would try to answer, but like I said it speaks for itself -- for any thinking person.


very true. by the way jay, did you see my post about jack van impe? unfortunately, non-christians see all christians as believing this.

on the rapture ready message boards, they're now thinking that barack obama is the antichrist because he is "too smooth." i'm dead serious.
clinevol98
Minor League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:45 pm

Postby nickols_k » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:09 am

I any from you has doubts then please read PRAYER section of my article and follow the steps described in that section to receive the answers!

Be bless!
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

Postby clinevol98 » Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:23 pm

nickols_k wrote:I any from you has doubts then please read PRAYER section of my article and follow the steps described in that section to receive the answers!

Be bless!


I pray that you would read 2 Peter 1:20-21...

"Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit."

and Revelation 22:18:

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book."

Quite obviously, these prophecies have their origin in the will of man and are private interpretations. Also, you are adding meanings to the prophecies in Revelation. I suggest you think about that.
clinevol98
Minor League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:45 pm

Postby nickols_k » Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:23 am

clinevol98 wrote:
nickols_k wrote:I any from you has doubts then please read PRAYER section of my article and follow the steps described in that section to receive the answers!

Be bless!


I pray that you would read 2 Peter 1:20-21...

"Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit."

and Revelation 22:18:

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book."

Quite obviously, these prophecies have their origin in the will of man and are private interpretations. Also, you are adding meanings to the prophecies in Revelation. I suggest you think about that.

Did you read BIBLE'S INACCURACIES section of my article?

Happy New Year!
Be bless!
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

Postby clinevol98 » Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:40 pm

no i haven't, and i'm not going to. the Bible is not inaccurate. if the bible is inaccurate, then God is either inaccurate, a liar, or both.

any passages that go against your personal private interpretation you dismiss as being inaccurate. i'm sorry; your arguments hold no water. i pray that you see the truth.
clinevol98
Minor League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:45 pm

Postby nickols_k » Sat Jan 06, 2007 10:11 am

clinevol98 wrote:no i haven't, and i'm not going to. the Bible is not inaccurate. if the bible is inaccurate, then God is either inaccurate, a liar, or both.

any passages that go against your personal private interpretation you dismiss as being inaccurate. i'm sorry; your arguments hold no water. i pray that you see the truth.


God is not liar but Bible was wrongly translated! Just all.

Be bless!
nickols_k
Minor League
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:32 pm

Next

Return to Eschatology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 4o2q7w3q0 and 0 guests

cron