By Ivan Squall
Published April 1, 1992
Bill Clinton was supposed to be the Democratic Party’s dream candidate. As a handsome, articulate Rhodes Scholar with a Yale law degree, this overachieving wunderkind may be the first bonafide political prodigy to be spawned by the Democrats in nearly thirty years.
Clinton was the nation’s youngest governor, and is now one of its longest serving. He can debate well, has a good sense of humor, delivers a decent stump speech, and displays an amazing command of nearly every public policy issue (at least domestically). He is at home with Washington political elites and New England liberal intellectuals, but seems comfortable sermonizing in southern Christian churches or at a civil rights conference.
He is a master of the political art of being all things to all people, or appearing to offer something to everyone. Yet somehow robo-candidate Clinton has been unable to capture the hearts of American voters. Apparently surface perfection does not always translate into certain election.
But why don’t Americans buy what Clinton is selling? What is missing in this man’s super-resumé? With George Bush (another candidate with a mile-long resumé) it has always been “the vision thing.” With Bill Clinton, the big stumbling block seems to be “the character thing.” From adultery, to draft evasion, to conflict of interest with his wife’s law firm, etc., etc., Clinton has become what Jerry Brown has aptly labelled the “scandal-a-week candidate.” Though these numerous other allegations might not as yet hold up in a court of law, they have nevertheless become a cumulatively powerful indictment before the court of public opinion, which rightfully applies a broader standard of judgment when determining those who are qualified to govern.
Concerning the adultery charge, most Americans have concluded for themselves that Clinton’s inability to deny the allegation is sufficient reason to believe it is true. After all, nobody who is truly innocent would hesitate for a moment to declare so, especially when a presidential nomination hangs in the balance. This is particularly true of Clinton who has throughout the campaign repeatedly proclaimed his innocence concerning the plethora of other scandalous behavior which has been attributed to him.
U.S. News & World Report recently reported that “the candidate privately admitted to his closest friends that he had had an extramarital affair, that it had ended, and that the woman had promised to remain silent” (3/30/92). Meanwhile, word has begun to leak out that the Washington Post has already obtained documents with the potential to destroy Clinton’s candidacy, though it is not known whether they concern any of the accusations made to date or relate to an entirely new set of charges.
Of course, not all voters care whether or not Clinton has been faithful to his wife. The idea that marital fidelity is purely a private matter, irrelevant to a man’s qualification to govern, has become increasingly accepted. Youthful pot-smoking would be viewed similarly. However, even though many people are willing to overlook the acts themselves, they are nevertheless quite disturbed by the fact that Clinton’s public statements on these and numerous other concerns have been conspicuously lacking in forthrightness. Calling on all the lawyerly sophistry at his command, Clinton has seemingly dared reporters to catch him in a lie. Yet as each new piece of contradictory evidence is brought forth, he somehow finds his own creative way to recast events and still be able to emerge claiming innocence.
But if Clinton believes that clever casuistry can sustain his campaign through November, then he has gravely miscalculated. The American electorate is in an angry mood this year, and is not much given to generosity when it comes to giving politicians the benefit of the doubt. The doubts which are engendered by his continued evasion of straightforward questions, are beginning to feed upon themselves. Many voters have begun to subscribe to the “iceberg” theory concerning revelations about Clinton’s character: what has already surfaced may not quite be enough to sink his presidential aspirations, but they fear that what has yet to come to light may be far more condemning.
For those who are willing to apply biblical criteria to the analysis of candidates for public office, the allegations against Clinton are particularly serious in that if true, they are indicative of other character flaws of an even more profound nature. Proverbs 6:32 states that “a man who commits adultery lacks judgment,” and Proverbs 7:4-5 teaches that wisdom will keep a man from the adulteress.
The act of adultery usually impacts only a few individuals, but choosing a President who lacks the judgment and wisdom to govern his own passions could conceivably bring disaster upon an entire nation. The scriptures warn us that “like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self control” (Proverbs. 25:28). Can we then be sure that the walls that protect our nation are truly secure if we should entrust their defense to a man who has demonstrated a lack of personal self-control?
Proverbs 12:22 teaches that “the Lord detests lying lips.” And should we not take extreme pains to be certain that the behavior of our most important civil officer not be detestable to God? If so, then truthfulness must be an unalterable prerequisite for any serious candidate. Ultimately, we know that righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.
This unavoidable reality should guide us in the selection of all those who seek our support for public office, but its urgency is never more evident than when we are given the responsibility to choose in whom to invest the authority to govern our nation. We must never allow ourselves to be blinded or beguiled by the brilliance of a man’s resumé or the smoothness of his words. Proven character and integrity must always be the first criterion by which we pass judgment on any presidential candidate.
Forerunner - Home » The Forerunner Newspaper »
Your comments are welcome!
High Quality Paperback — 200 pages
A Reasonable Response to Christian Postmodernism
Includes a response to the book Christian Jihad by Colonel V. Doner
The title of this book is a misnomer. In reality, I am not trying to get anyone to shut up, but rather to provoke a discussion. This book is a warning about the philosophy of “Christian postmodernism” and the threat that it poses not only to Christian orthodoxy, but to the peace and prosperity our culture as well. The purpose is to equip the reader with some basic principles that can be used to refute their arguments.
Part 1 is a response to some of the recent writings by Frank Schaeffer, the son of the late Francis Schaeffer. This was originally written as a defense against Frank’s attacks on pro-life street activism – a movement that his father helped bring into being through his books, A Christian Manifesto, How Should We Then Live? and Whatever Happened to the Human Race? These works have impacted literally hundreds of thousands of Christian activists.
Part 2 is a response to Colonel Doner and his book, Christian Jihad: Neo-Fundamentalists and the Polarization of America. Doner was one of the key architects of the Christian Right that emerged in the 1980s, who now represents the disillusionment and defection many Christian activists experienced in the 1990s and 2000s. There is still great hope for America to be reformed according to biblical principles. As a new generation is emerging, it is important to recognize the mistakes that Christian activists have made in the past even while holding to a vision for the future.
$14.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
God’s Law and Society powerfully presents a comprehensive worldview based upon the ethical system found in the Law of God.
Speakers include: R.J. Rushdoony, George Grant, Howard Phillips, R.C. Sproul Jr., Ken Gentry, Gary DeMar, Jay Grimstead, Steven Schlissel, Andrew Sandlin, Eric Holmberg, and more!
Sixteen Christian leaders and scholars answer some of the most common questions and misconceptions related to this volatile issue:
1. Are we under Law or under Grace?
2. Does the Old Testament Law apply today?
3. Can we legislate morality?
4. What are the biblical foundations of government?
5. Was America founded as a Christian nation?
6. What about the separation of Church and State?
7. Is neutrality a myth?
8. What about non-Christians and the Law of God?
9. Would there be “freedom” in a Christian republic?
10. What would a “Christian America” look like?
Perfect for group instruction as well as personal Bible study.
Ten parts, over four hours of instruction!
Running Time: 240 minutes
Watch over 60 on-line video interviews from God’s Law and Society.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Who is the dreaded beast of Revelation?
Now at last, a plausible candidate for this personification of evil incarnate has been identified (or re-identified). Ken Gentry’s insightful analysis of scripture and history is likely to revolutionize your understanding of the book of Revelation — and even more importantly — amplify and energize your entire Christian worldview!
Historical footage and other graphics are used to illustrate the lecture Dr. Gentry presented at the 1999 Ligonier Conference in Orlando, Florida. It is followed by a one-hour question and answer session addressing the key concerns and objections typically raised in response to his position. This presentation also features an introduction that touches on not only the confusion and controversy surrounding this issue — but just why it may well be one of the most significant issues facing the Church today.
Ideal for group meetings, personal Bible study — for anyone who wants to understand the historical context of John’s famous letter “… to the seven churches which are in Asia.” (Revelation 1:4)
Running Time: 145 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Exposing The Occult Roots of Abortion
This presentation looks at the spiritual roots of abortion and exposes the myths surrounding child killing. Little known historical facts about abortion and how they relate to modern feminism are presented logically and accurately. Has been effective in converting many to a pro-life position.
Massacre of Innocence goes where no pro-life presentation has gone before in “tearing the lid off abortion” to reveal the spiritual realities we must battle if we will bring an end to this crime. The presentation is absorbing, fast-paced, informative and incredibly devastating to any attempt to justify abortion.
“… an extraordinary statement … a powerfully articulate presentation about what abortion really means, and why a great and moral nation like the United States must not allow the slaughter to continue.”
— Congressman Robert K. Dornan
Running time: 85 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)