By P. Andrew Sandlin
Published February 1, 1994
Today we have a situation where the civil magistrates will not uphold the law of God. At some point it may become necessary for Christians to institute a competitive government to bring lasting reformation. This would be similar to what happened in the time of John Knox, Oliver Cromwell or at the time of the American Revolution when the colonists broke away from England by electing a Continental Congress.
But to have reformation in society first there needs to be reformation in the Church. We can’t undo 150 years of antinomianism (anti-Biblical Law position) in the Church in two or three years. It has to be done incrementally. Ultimately, the Church believes not in revolution but in regeneration and reformation. That is not to say that revolution in all circumstances is wrong. We certainly need to take the intermediate steps first. Any idea of violence or revolution should be the last resort. But it is something that we cannot rule out.
Instituting a competitive or shadow government, something similar to the British model under Oliver Cromwell, is an excellent idea. If there ever came a time of a great monumental national disaster, it would be wise to be prepared for that. But most Christians are not adequately prepared for that because of a faulty theology. Even so, it is something that we need to be thinking about. The shadow government could begin to issue various statements in opposition to the ruling power. For instance, if a president of the United States signs executive orders supporting fetal tissue research, the Christian commonwealth could issue a proclamation stating disagreement.
The steps toward declaring an alternate shadow government are enormous tasks. First, there has to be greater unity in the Church. We would do that not by getting rid of distinctives but by establishing the bare minimum distinctives which would be based on orthodoxy found in the councils and creeds of the early Church. Councils or presbyteries could be formed on the basis of Church covenants between local churches in specific regions. All churches could work together from Baptist, to Reformed, to Methodist, to whoever affirmed the core elements of Christianity.
Second, a national synod could be called. A number of representatives from each group could be sent. The idea would be to get together and discuss the platform, the goals of the new Christian republic and then elect representatives. But first there is the strong necessity of unity on the basis of orthodoxy. Unity is necessary before we can have this kind of shadow government.
Holding ecclesiastical courts could be a prerequisite to instituting a shadow government. We could begin by issuing proclamations to the leaders of the country and to people who are involved in the abortion industry. The proclamations would state that they are in violation of the moral Law of God by promoting child killing. They would be called upon to repent or suffer the wrath of God.
The filing of these “covenantal lawsuits” presupposes that the Church has specifically endowed power from the Lord according to Matthew 16:19 that “whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven.” The Church is an earthly extension of the heavenly throne room. When we are operating according to the word of God and we make declarations, they mean something – not just here but in heaven. We are saying that we are the Church of God and authority is given to us here on earth because authority has also been given to us in heaven. John the Baptist shook his finger in the face of the king and said, “It is not lawful for you to have her” (Matthew 14:4). The Church needs to do that as well.
John Knox, in his book The Reformation of Scotland, outlined model without which the British model of government under Oliver Cromwell never would have been possible. Knox discovered the biblical process by which a monarch might be deposed; Cromwell implemented it. They were so covenantal in their thinking that they recognized that civil government is based on a covenant between the magistrate (or the representative or king) and the populace. The view was that when the magistrate defects from the covenant, it is the duty of the people to overthrow him. There is definitely an association between Knox and Cromwell. When Charles I was beheaded, the understanding was that he had broken faith with the people. Their view was that when the magistrate breaks faith, then he may legitimately be deposed.
The Puritan view of the relationship between the Church and the State was the foundation for the American colonial view of government. This was true of Massachusetts and Connecticut and to a lesser extent in the Southern colonies. When the Mayflower Compact was written, the Pilgrims had a covenantal idea of the nature of civil government. This was a foundation for later colonies established throughout the 1600s. These covenants were influenced by what Knox had done in Scotland and what the Puritans had done in England.
We can also look at Puritan America and the colonists as laying the foundation for issuing the Declaration of Independence to King George III in 1776. Although it is true that there was a strong deistic influence at the time of the signing of the Declaration, there is no question that there were the residual effects of strong Puritan influence. The American Revolution could not have occurred without the 150-year-old Puritan foundation in America.
Then we need to understand the Jeffersonian distinction between Church and State. The idea of “separation of Church and State” is very misleading. It is not a constitutional phrase but it came afterward in the writings of Jefferson. The Church and the State are separate spheres of government. Separation of Church and State does not mean separation of the State from God. The issue is not whether the Church should intrude on the State’s affairs. The Church should not. Neither should the State intrude on the Church’s affairs. But God has a right to interfere in the affairs of both. Civil government is not secular; it still stands under the law of God.
With this whole groundswell of political conservatism in the Church, we also need to have a revival of the Puritan idea of the authority of the law of God. Of course, that needs to begin in the churches. But our age is an antinomian age. When Paul says, “For you are not under law, but under grace” (Romans 6:14), for so long that has been interpreted to mean that the law does not have any effect on our lives. But Paul was saying that the law was not over us in a sentence of death because we have been justified. We do not adhere to the law as a basis for justification. But after we are saved, the law is the standard of individual sanctification, ecclesiastical sanctification, social sanctification and political sanctification. The Church has to understand and preach the law of God as the only standard.
What we are seeing today in the groundswell of Christian conservative activism is an instinctive flailing of the arms back and forth. We know that abortion on demand is prominent and then falsely believe that our society is under satanic rulership. But we need to have a long term, principled, theological response to the situation. The Puritan covenantal understanding of the law of God can provide that.
In the meantime, we need to keep pressing our advantage. The Church should begin by making public declarations against sin in our society. We must declare the areas in which the civil government has violated the moral Law of God. And we must do this fearlessly. The gates of hell shall not prevail against the Church.
Based in part on an interview with Andrew Sandlin, editor of Chalcedon Report
Forerunner - Home » The Forerunner Newspaper » Reconstruction
Your comments are welcome!
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“Here I stand … I can do no other!”
With these immortal words, an unknown German monk sparked a spiritual revolution that changed the world.
The dramatic classic film of Martin Luther’s life was released in theaters worldwide in the 1950s and was nominated for two Oscars. A magnificent depiction of Luther and the forces at work in the surrounding society that resulted in his historic reform efforts, this film traces Luther’s life from a guilt-burdened monk to his eventual break with the Roman Catholic Church.
Running time: 105 minutes
Special offer: Order 5 or more for $5 each.
Watch a clip from Martin Luther.
$9.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the free Study Guide!
Is there a connection between pagan religion and the abortion industry?
This powerful presentation traces the biblical roots of child sacrifice and then delves into the social, political and cultural fall-out that this sin against God and crime against humanity has produced in our beleaguered society.
Conceived as a sequel and update to the 1988 classic, The Massacre of Innocence, the new title, The Abortion Matrix, is entirely fitting. It not only references abortion’s specific target – the sacred matrix where human beings are formed in the womb in the very image of God, but it also implies the existence of a conspiracy, a matrix of seemingly disparate forces that are driving this holocaust.
The occult activity surrounding the abortion industry is exposed with numerous examples. But are these just aberrations, bizarre yet anomalous examples of abortionists who just happen to have ties to modern day witchcraft? Or is this representative of something deeper, more sinister and even endemic to the entire abortion movement?
As the allusion to the film of over a decade ago suggests, the viewer may learn that things are not always as they appear to be. The Abortion Matrix reveals the reality of child-killing and strikes the proper moral chord to move hearts to fulfill the biblical responsibility to rescue those unjustly sentenced to death and to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves (Proverbs 24:11,12; 31:8,9).
Speakers include: George Grant, Peter Hammond, RC Sproul Jr., Paul Jehle, Lou Engle, Rusty Thomas, Flip Benham, Janet Porter and many more.
Ten parts, over three hours of instruction!
Running Time: 195 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
That Swiss Hermit Strikes Again!
Dr. Schaeffer, who was one of the most influential Christian thinkers in the twentieth century, shows that secular humanism has displaced the Judeo-Christian consensus that once defined our nation’s moral boundaries. Law, education, and medicine have all been reshaped for the worse as a consequence. America’s dominant worldview changed, Schaeffer charges, when Christians weren’t looking.
Schaeffer lists two reasons for evangelical indifference: a false concept of spirituality and fear. He calls on believers to stand against the tyranny and moral chaos that come when humanism reigns-and warns that believers may, at some point, be forced to make the hard choice between obeying God or Caesar. A Christian Manifesto is a thought-provoking and bracing Christian analysis of American culture and the obligation Christians have to engage the culture with the claims of Christ.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)