By Editorial Staff
Published January 31, 2001
By Rick Cundiff, Staff Writer, Ocala Star Banner
OCALA — A federal prosecutor in the extortion trial of Dr. James Scott Pendergraft IV said Tuesday that when Pendergraft testifies he “shucks and jives,” a comment that one of Pendergraft’s lawyers said has racial overtones.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Devereaux made the remark during his closing argument in the case.
“He’s a man that, when you ask him a question and you want to get a straight answer, shucks and jives,” Devereaux said.
Devereaux is white. Pendergraft and his attorneys, Jacob Rose and Larry Colleton, are black.
Pendergraft owns the Ocala Women’s Center on Pine Avenue and four other clinics in Florida that provide abortions. He and his associate Michael Spielvogel are charged with conspiring to extort millions of dollars from Marion County government through a lawsuit attorney Roy Lucas filed in December 1998.
Rose said he found Devereaux’s remark offensive.
“Absolutely, unquestionably, I was offended by it, and Dr. Pendergraft was as well,” he said. “With respect to making that kind of statement, it shouldn’t be allowed. He owes me and Dr. Pendergraft and everyone else in that courtroom an apology. I do intend to address it further. That, to me, was so offensive and out of line.”
Rose declined to be more specific about what action he planned.
Devereaux declined to comment afterward, as did Steve Cole, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida.
The FBI began investigating Spielvogel and Pendergraft in October 1997, shortly after Marion County commissioners sent a one-paragraph letter asking Pendergraft to reconsider opening a women’s clinic in Ocala.
Soon after Pendergraft received the letter, Spielvogel called Commissioner Larry Cretul, who had signed the letter as commission chairman. In that telephone conversation, Cretul testified, Spielvogel said the county could expect “violent protests and firebombings” at the clinic, but the county could avoid problems by purchasing the clinic.
Two days later, Cretul reported that conversation to the Marion County Sheriff’s Office, which referred him to the FBI. At the FBI’s instruction, Cretul secretly taped subsequent telephone conversations with Spielvogel and with Pendergraft.
Devereaux’s comment was perhaps the most controversial in a day of strong rhetoric, as Devereaux, his assistant Judy Hunt, Rose and Spielvogel attorney Daniel Brodersen each made their final case to the jury.
Devereaux and Hunt accused Pendergraft and Spielvogel of lying on the witness stand.
“You got to see crime in progress, right from that witness stand,” Devereaux told jurors. “And what crime in progress? Perjury. And what crime in progress? Obstruction of justice.”
For his part, Rose attacked the government’s case as “great drama, a lot of atmosphere, no evidence.”
“When the light comes on, . . . there’s absolutely no evidence of guilt,” Rose said.
Rose literally waved the flag for his client Tuesday, at one point pulling out a small American flag as he accused Cretul of using his office to advance his personal stand against abortion.
“Once you’re paid by the public, under our flag,” Rose said, “you are not allowed to carry out a personal agenda. It is absolutely, unequivocally un-American.”
The case rests on two affidavits, one by Spielvogel and the other by Pendergraft, that were filed as part of the lawsuit. Senior U.S. District Judge William Terrell Hodges dismissed the lawsuit a year after it was filed because Lucas didn’t pursue it.
In his affidavit, Spielvogel alleged Cretul made threats against his life, his wife and the clinic during a telephone conversation on Jan. 29, 1998, the same day a Birmingham, Ala., clinic was bombed. That bombing killed an off-duty police officer and critically injured a nurse.
Spielvogel admitted on the stand last week that Cretul made no such threats. Brodersen, Spielvogel’s lawyer, argued that the issue wasn’t whether Cretul actually made such threats but whether Spielvogel felt threatened by a comment from Cretul that protest letters from Ocala ministers were “gonna be mild.”
“If you find that Michael Spielvogel was threatened by that comment, then the government’s entire case comes crashing down,” he said. “The house of cards collapses.”
Pendergraft’s affidavit said Spielvogel repeated Cretul’s alleged threats to him as Cretul made them.
Lucas, who disappeared before Pendergraft and Spielvogel were indicted last June, attempted to use those affidavits to get money from the county in a meeting in March 1999 with Pendergraft, Spielvogel and Virgil “Bill” Wright III, a lawyer representing the county.
Pendergraft testified last week that his purpose in filing the lawsuit was to force anti-abortion protesters back from the clinic and to force the city to allow off-duty police officers to work as clinic security guards.
A secretly recorded FBI videotape of the March 1999 meeting shows Lucas threatening to bankrupt the county by asking for a $100 million jury verdict under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act if the case went to trial. Spielvogel repeated his allegations against Cretul, and Pendergraft vowed to bankrupt the county and place a statue of himself in the town square saying he “brought freedom to Ocala.”
Spielvogel testified last week that he had faked a call from Cretul, repeating threats Cretul allegedly made, as Pendergraft walked into the office at the Orlando clinic. Spielvogel also said he first told his own attorney, Pendergraft and Pendergraft’s attorneys about the faked call about 10 days after the trial had begun.
Prosecutors Hunt and Devereaux argued Tuesday that the faked call, on which Pendergraft based his affidavit supporting Spielvogel, never happened either.
“These events didn’t happen. We know they didn’t happen,” she said.
The FBI’s covert audiotapes and videotape were the only things that prevented Pendergraft and Spielvogel from destroying Cretul’s reputation and collecting a substantial amount of money from the county, Hunt said.
“Without those FBI tapes, they could have gotten away with it,” she said.
The trial is scheduled to resume 9 a.m. today, its 17th day, with jury instructions. Hodges said Tuesday those instructions are likely to take about half an hour, after which the jury will begin deliberating.
Forerunner - Home » Florida's Murder Industry »
Your comments are welcome!
Exposes the Dangers of Abortion to Women!
These shocking eyewitness accounts expose the dangers of abortion not only to unborn children, but to the health and lives women as well. An antidote to the smokescreens of the liberal media, these short clips show what really happens in and around abortion clinics.
Although the content is emotionally gut-wrenching, these videos have been used in church seminars and small groups to educate Christians on the abortion issue and to lead people toward a pro-life position. Contains 2 hours and 40 minutes of materials that can be shown separately.
Watch these pro-life videos on-line.
“These videos helped change my mind from pro-choice to pro-life. Your videos are what did it for me. I will be walking in next year’s March For Life in San Francisco.” — A. Jackson, California
“I was going to have an abortion until I saw your video. Praise Jesus!”
— M. Drew, YouTube Commenter
$4.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Who is the dreaded beast of Revelation?
Now at last, a plausible candidate for this personification of evil incarnate has been identified (or re-identified). Ken Gentry’s insightful analysis of scripture and history is likely to revolutionize your understanding of the book of Revelation — and even more importantly — amplify and energize your entire Christian worldview!
Historical footage and other graphics are used to illustrate the lecture Dr. Gentry presented at the 1999 Ligonier Conference in Orlando, Florida. It is followed by a one-hour question and answer session addressing the key concerns and objections typically raised in response to his position. This presentation also features an introduction that touches on not only the confusion and controversy surrounding this issue — but just why it may well be one of the most significant issues facing the Church today.
Ideal for group meetings, personal Bible study — for anyone who wants to understand the historical context of John’s famous letter “… to the seven churches which are in Asia.” (Revelation 1:4)
Running Time: 145 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
That Swiss Hermit Strikes Again!
Dr. Schaeffer, who was one of the most influential Christian thinkers in the twentieth century, shows that secular humanism has displaced the Judeo-Christian consensus that once defined our nation’s moral boundaries. Law, education, and medicine have all been reshaped for the worse as a consequence. America’s dominant worldview changed, Schaeffer charges, when Christians weren’t looking.
Schaeffer lists two reasons for evangelical indifference: a false concept of spirituality and fear. He calls on believers to stand against the tyranny and moral chaos that come when humanism reigns-and warns that believers may, at some point, be forced to make the hard choice between obeying God or Caesar. A Christian Manifesto is a thought-provoking and bracing Christian analysis of American culture and the obligation Christians have to engage the culture with the claims of Christ.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)