Notes on Daniel: Calvin’s Commentary on Daniel

Video: Notes on Daniel: Calvin's Commentary on Daniel
Notes on Daniel: Calvin's Commentary on Daniel
Click play to connect to youtube

In reading Calvin’s Commentary on Daniel, a few ideas come to mind.

First, I am always amazed at how readable and lucid Calvin is – even for a 16th century theologian translated into English from Latin.

Book

In the Days of These Kings

Jay Rogers

The Book of Daniel in Preterist Perspective

The overarching message of Daniel is that Jesus the Messiah is even now ruling over the nations. He is the King of kings. Daniel tells us that Messiah’s kingdom will advance in the whole world from “generation to generation” (Daniel 4:4,34). Christ’s dominion is “given to the people of the saints of the most High” (Daniel 7:22). Our purpose then is to see “all people, nations, and languages … serve and obey him” (Daniel 7:14,27).

This comprehensive work offers a fascinating look at the book of Daniel in preterist perspective. Great attention is paid to the writings of ancient and modern historians and scholars to connect the dots and demonstrate the continuity of Daniel’s prophecy with all of Scripture.

Read more

Second, I see a few minor discrepancies in Calvin’s approach to Daniel 7 and Revelation 13 that I would disagree with. Regarding the ten kings of Daniel 7 (and the seven kings of Revelation 13) Calvin does not see “ten” as a finite number, but as a symbolic number. He also sees the “Little Horn” of Daniel 7 as the period of persecution under all the Caesars – especially Nero through Titus. I differ in that I would say the Little Horn refers specifically to Nero. Calvin also does not make “time, times and half a time” to mean exactly three-and-a-half years, but rather several years or even several decades. I am in full agreement with Calvin that the kings of Daniel 7 must be the Roman Caesars of the first century. The thrust of the whole prophecy of Daniel is to point to the time of the birth of the Messiah – “in the days of these kings” (Daniel 2:44).

Third, with regard to Daniel 7, Calvin is solidly a preterist. I explain this above – he never deviates from this method of interpretation when dealing with Daniel. The “ten kings” are the Roman Caesars.

Fourth, Calvin sees parallels between Daniel 7, Matthew 24 and Revelation 13. Even though Calvin never wrote a commentary on Revelation, we can easily see from the commentary below that Calvin became a more solid preterist toward the end of his life.

As long, therefore, as the cruelty of the Caesars oppressed God’s Church, it was committed into their hands. We have already seen how many Caesars were enemies of the true Church. First, of all, Nero raged most cruelly, for he burnt some thousands of Christians at Rome, to extinguish the infamy which raged against himself. The people could not endure his barbarity; for, while the fourth part of the city was destroyed by Nero, he was enjoying his pleasure and rejoicing so mournful a spectacle! As he feared the popular tumult against himself, he laid hold of many Christians, and offered them to the people as a kind of expiation. Those who followed him, did not cease to pour forth innocent blood, and those who seemed to be endued with some degree of clemency and humanity were all at length seized with a diabolic fury. Trajan was esteemed a very excellent prince, and yet we know how he commanded the Christians everywhere to be slain, since he thought them obstinate in their error. And others were more savage still. No wonder, therefore, the angel predicts, even for “a time, and times, and the division of a time” [Daniel 7:25], that license would be given to the tyrants and enemies of the Church to pervert all things, to despise God, and set aside all justice, and to execute a cruel and barbarous slaughter. This ought to be predicted for two reasons: first, lest through length of time the faithful should fall away, because when “the time” a space of about ten years had passed, they would come to the times, consisting of about fifty or a hundred years.

This, then, was one reason why God admonished the faithful concerning the “time and times.” But he wished also to mitigate their sorrow by adding “half a time,” thus promising some moderation and ending to such great calamities. The language of our Lord to his Apostles concerning the various commotion of the earth, corresponds very well with this view. “There shall arise wars and rumors of wars, and no end as yet,” says he. He announces them as the preludes to greater evils, when the whole of Judea should be devastated with wars and other slaughters. He afterwards adds, “Unless those days had been shortened” [Matthew 24:6; Mark 13:7; Luke 21:9]. This shortening of the days is here noticed as if the Lord cut short; a continued succession of them. For when the possession of the tyranny appeared fierce, then suddenly and beyond the expectation of all, God at length snatched away his Church, and then the evangelical doctrine emerged, and was celebrated everywhere. God, therefore, then shortened the days on account of his own elect, and this is understood by the last clause, a division of a time (Calvin, Commentary on Daniel 7:25).

Your comments are welcome

Use Textile help to style your comments

Suggested products