Notes on Daniel -- Part 1 -- Historicism or Preterism?
By Jay Rogers
I think it would be interesting to debate the book of Daniel as it applies to historicism and preterism.
Historicism was popular among the reformers, but I would say that their fixation on Pope Leo as the Beast of Revelation 13 at that time was actually a form of futurism. We can only call that view "historicism" today.
As a matter of fact, postmillennialism as a distinct theology from amillennialism came about once the Puritans realized that the papacy was actually gaining ground. They formed the idea of "progressive millennialism." This was the idea that eventually the papacy would be defeated. This became known as postmillennialism. The most popular form of this idea was historical postmillennialism.
I am a preterist because I think the book of Revelation has to be interpreted in light of passages in Daniel and the Mount Olivet Discourse (Mt. 24). The book of Daniel definitely points to the Roman Empire at the time of Christ. Jesus points to the fulfillment of timing of the "Fourth Kingdom" prophecy in the book of Daniel (the abomination that causes desolation) as occurring in the first century.
I know that some historicists like to stretch Daniel's "Fourth Kingdom" prophecies to include all of history. So do the futurists and dispensationalists!
But if we let Daniel interpret Daniel, I think the only immediate application is the first century.
Daniel 2:44 "And in the days of those kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever."
"And in the days of these kings" -- Simply put, in the days of the Roman Empire.
At that time, the kingdom of God will be brought to earth by Jesus Christ and shall never be destroyed but it shall war against the kingdoms of this world and they shall become part of "the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ" (Rev. 11:15).
While I agree that this is a progressive millennial kingdom, I do not see that the "kings" of Daniel and Revelation can be thought of as being the papacy.
Daniel is not a prophecy given to Protestants to describe the time of the Reformation. It is a prophecy meant for the Jews to prove to them the timing of the coming of Messiah. The context and purpose of the passage point to a first century fulfillment. So do the key timing passages of the prophecy as well as the application of specific characteristics of the "little horn" to describe Caesar Nero.
Matthew 24 and the book of Revelation explain that this prophecy is fulfilled in the time of Jesus. But for now I will deal solely with Daniel.
Back to document index
The Real Jesus: Who is the Real Jesus? Ever since the dawn of modern rationalism, skeptics have sought to use textual criticism, archaeology and historical reconstructions to uncover the "historical Jesus" -- a wise teacher who said many wonderful things, but fulfilled no prophecies, performed no miracles and certainly did not rise from the dead in triumph over sin. Over the past 100 years, however, startling discoveries in biblical archaeology and scholarship have all but vanquished the faulty assumptions of these doubting modernists. Regretably, these discoveries have often been ignored by the skeptics as well as by the popular media. As a result, the liberal view still holds sway in universities and impacts the culture and even much of the church.
|
This presentation explodes the myths of these critics and the movies, books and television programs that have popularized their views.
Presented in ten parts -- perfect for individual, family and classroom study -- viewers will be challenged to go deeper in their knowledge of Christ in order to be able to defend their faith and present the truth to a skeptical modern world – that the Jesus of the Gospels is the Jesus of history -- "the same yesterday, today and forever" (Hebrews 13:8). He is the real Jesus. Speakers include: George Grant, Ted Baehr, Stephen Mansfield, Raymond Ortlund, Phil Kayser, David Lutzweiler, Jay Grimstead, J.P. Holding, and Eric Holmberg. Ten parts, over two hours of instruction! Running Time: 130 minutes
|
| The Beast of Revelation: IDENTIFIED
Who is the dreaded beast of Revelation? Now at last, a plausible candidate for this personification of evil incarnate has been identified (or re-identified). Ken Gentry's insightful analysis of scripture and history is likely to revolutionize your understanding of the book of Revelation -- and even more importantly -- amplify and energize your entire Christian worldview! Historical footage and other graphics are used to illustrate the lecture Dr. Gentry presented at the 1999 Ligonier Conference in Orlando, Florida. It is followed by a one-hour question and answer session addressing the key concerns and objections typically raised in response to his position. This presentation also features an introduction that touches on not only the confusion and controversy surrounding this issue -- but just why it may well be one of the most significant issues facing the Church today. Ideal for group meetings, personal Bible study -- for anyone who wants to understand the historical context of John's famous letter "... to the seven churches which are in Asia." (Revelation 1:4) |
![]()
(Available in DVD only) $17.95 ORDER NOW!
|
INCLUDES A FREE Sixteen Christian leaders and scholars answer some of the most common questions and misperceptions related to this volatile issue: Download the free |
Perfect for group instruction as well as personal
Bible study. Speakers include: George Grant, Howard Phillips,
R.C. Sproul Jr., Ken Gentry, Gary DeMar, Jay Grimstead, R.J. Rushdoony,
Steven Schlissel, Andrew Sandlin, Eric Holmberg, and more!
Ten parts, over four hours of instruction! Watch over 60 streaming videos from God's Law and Society at:
Price reduced! |
| Amazing Grace: The History and Theology of Calvinism
Over four hours of instruction! Just what is “Calvinism?” Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology? This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer. |
![]()
$19.95 ORDER NOW!
|
|
The Forerunner Forum is the discussion group for this web site. The purpose of the group is to engage in discussion about the articles on-line. If you want to discuss any article or video on this web site, visit The Forerunner Forum. |
| VIDEOS | WORDS | BLOG | DISCUSSION | WHAT'S NEW | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SEARCH | DONATE | JAY'S BIO | HOME |
For more information, contact:
| The Forerunner jrogers@forerunner.com |
|
P.O. Box 362173 Melbourne, FL 32936-2173 |







