By Editorial Staff
Published January 1, 1988
News Service 2000 Commentary
by David Aikman
When an obscure peanut farmer from Plains, Georgia, offered himself as a candidate for the democratic nomination for the presidency in 1976, the only surprising part of his Renaissance-style resume (farmer, businessman, nuclear engineer, naval officer, etc.) was the listing of the profession “Christian” along with all the others.
What did he mean, inquired the bemused but curious Washington press corps that had been unleashed upon this particular candidate? Southern Baptist, okay, but Christian? Was this some new church denomination?
When Carter obligingly explained that he was a “born-again” Christian – the quotation marks are still obligatory in the nation’s major newspapers – the curiosity turned to bafflement. What strange beast was that? A snake-handler, perhaps, or something to do with Billy Graham? In capital cities around the world American foreign correspondents confessed to their Japanese friends that they, too, couldn’t understand what a “born-again Christian” was.
Jimmy Carter, as everyone now knows, survived this first bout with the provinciality of the nation’s major newspaper reporters. In fact, he enjoyed the last laugh by winning a decisive majority among the nation’s evangelical voters in the 1976 general election, even though his margin of victory nationally was a razor-thin two percent.
But there was little for most of us to smirk about. At a time when, according to the pollster George Gallup, some 40 million Americans described themselves as “born again,” the term was obviously as unfamiliar to most American news reporters as the Tibetan Book of the Dead.
In a vague effort to push the concept of a large, grass-roots American evangelical community out of sight and mind, therefore, much of the media resorted to the safe old standby term for people of religious conviction: they were “fundamentalists.” The word, with its unmistakable odor of uncouthness and fanaticism, had the useful effect of consigning evangelicals to the category of the unreportable: what they believed somehow shouldn’t be taken seriously; and anyway, they were all rather tedious.
America’s “fundamentalists,” however, wouldn’t conveniently go away. Having supported Jimmy Carter, they then demonstrated an annoying unpredictability in 1980 by deserting him in droves to vote for his Republican opponent, Ronald Reagan. And they kept growing. A 1985 Gallup testing of evangelical Christians found that the 40 million, in less than a decade, had grown to some 90 million. Other studies confirmed the findings: 94 percent of Americans believed in a personal God, 40 percent or more attended church weekly, and by every other criterion, America was a far more religious country in the 1980’s than it had been for decades.
All of these developments were barely noticed by the American media. Even such tell-tale signs as a consistent growth in American missionaries being sent overseas, failed to alert the vast majority of the nation’s reporters to the unique phenomenon taking place in their midst, namely, one of the most dramatic nationwide increases in evangelical Christian belief for nearly a century.
Overseas, of course, the rapid growth of Christian churches in the Third World escaped notice altogether on the part of the stars of investigative journalism. It was not until the overthrow of the Shah of Iran in 1979, the U.S. hostage crisis, and the Ayatollah Khomeini’s export of his radical Islamic views that consciousness began to dawn. Something, obviously, was afoot within Islam. Of course, it must be fundamentalism!
The failure to observe at all, not to mention to analyze and explain, the rise of evangelical Christianity in the U.S. over a period of two decades must constitute one of the great modern blind spots of the American journalistic mind. It is a failure sadly paralleled by the inability of Western reporters during the same period to grasp the scope of the Khomeinyist Islamic revival, or the dangerous reverberations of a renascent Islam, even among Muslim communities around the world not belonging to the minority Shi’ite sect of Islam dominant in Iran.
Finally, there is a third media failure in the category of modern faiths, that of not explaining how the 20th century’s great secular religion, Marxism, has continued to attract Third World adherents when its economic tenets have been universally demonstrated to be false.
This singular media blindness has had all sorts of unpleasant consequences, and not just among American evangelicals who have had to endure the many prejudices – born of ignorance – that swoop around the public marketplace. Americans as a whole, have been short-changed by those whose job is to report the news and analyze events around the world. They have been kept in the dark about one of the great stories of the century, the emergence of a growing, perhaps mortal competition among the world’s great religions for the ultimate loyalties of mankind.
Why has the U.S. press failed so conspicuously to do justice to this phenomenon? An ordinary explanation would be ignorance. But the fact is that the ignorance is at least partly wilful. Survey after survey of the U.S. media has confirmed one overwhelming fact: U.S. reporters tend to be overwhelmingly secular in their worldview, they tend not to respect religious faith in general, and they for the most part espouse a system of values that is inherently hostile to the traditional Western values handed down in the Bible.
In a well-known survey of 216 leading U.S. journalists conducted in 1981 by sociologists S. Robert Lichter and Stanley Rothman, 54 percent of the respondents thought adultery was not wrong, 75 percent considered homosexuality an acceptable life-style, 86 percent seldom or never went to church or synagogue, and 90 percent thought that abortion was an inherent right of women.
If those figures are frightening for Christians, they are likely to be even more strikingly skewed away from traditional values today than 6 years ago. Of course, the recent string of scandals and internecine squabbles within the evangelical community has not made the task of reporting sympathetically about it any easier. In fact, U.S. news organizations have at times displayed open hostility towards any Christian organization with a high profile and explicit evangelical positions, tarring much of Christendom with the opprobrium earned by only a small part of it.
In so doing, some journalists have departed from one of the first principles of their professional code of ethics: keeping personal likes and dislikes out of the business of reporting. They have, though, departed from a more important principle as well: being curious about life, and open-minded enough to ask a lot of questions. In theory, that’s what journalists are supposed to do all along.
Is there a Christian solution to this? Yes, there is. But if it is simple, it is not easy. For years, Christians have been content to drift along with the changing fashions of trendy whims of the general populace. They have been confident that there isn’t too much difference between Christian and non-Christian standards and behavior in private life and society.
That confidence is utterly misplaced in today’s climate. If God’s people are not to be completely swamped by the evolution of much of modern culture into barbarism and neo-paganism, then they must fashion the instruments of their own cultural expression, including their news media, for themselves. Otherwise, they will be unable to accomplish the very first thing, to discern the signs of the times. This refashioning includes, in a manner of speaking, re-inventing journalism, and applying to it the biblical standards evangelical Christians demand of their own and other Christians’ private lives.
Little by little, in such outstanding locations as CBN University’s journalism program, or in the Communications program of Youth With a Mission, this is being done. But until journalism as a whole has been significantly redeemed from its present sunken worldliness, one of the great stories of the millennium – how more people than ever before are finding Christ – is going to be lost to the world at large.
Forerunner - Home » The Forerunner Newspaper » National Events
Your comments are welcome!
That Swiss Hermit Strikes Again!
Dr. Schaeffer, who was one of the most influential Christian thinkers in the twentieth century, shows that secular humanism has displaced the Judeo-Christian consensus that once defined our nation’s moral boundaries. Law, education, and medicine have all been reshaped for the worse as a consequence. America’s dominant worldview changed, Schaeffer charges, when Christians weren’t looking.
Schaeffer lists two reasons for evangelical indifference: a false concept of spirituality and fear. He calls on believers to stand against the tyranny and moral chaos that come when humanism reigns-and warns that believers may, at some point, be forced to make the hard choice between obeying God or Caesar. A Christian Manifesto is a thought-provoking and bracing Christian analysis of American culture and the obligation Christians have to engage the culture with the claims of Christ.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Exposing The Occult Roots of Abortion
This presentation looks at the spiritual roots of abortion and exposes the myths surrounding child killing. Little known historical facts about abortion and how they relate to modern feminism are presented logically and accurately. Has been effective in converting many to a pro-life position.
Massacre of Innocence goes where no pro-life presentation has gone before in “tearing the lid off abortion” to reveal the spiritual realities we must battle if we will bring an end to this crime. The presentation is absorbing, fast-paced, informative and incredibly devastating to any attempt to justify abortion.
“… an extraordinary statement … a powerfully articulate presentation about what abortion really means, and why a great and moral nation like the United States must not allow the slaughter to continue.”
— Congressman Robert K. Dornan
Running time: 85 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the free Study Guide!
Is there a connection between pagan religion and the abortion industry?
This powerful presentation traces the biblical roots of child sacrifice and then delves into the social, political and cultural fall-out that this sin against God and crime against humanity has produced in our beleaguered society.
Conceived as a sequel and update to the 1988 classic, The Massacre of Innocence, the new title, The Abortion Matrix, is entirely fitting. It not only references abortion’s specific target – the sacred matrix where human beings are formed in the womb in the very image of God, but it also implies the existence of a conspiracy, a matrix of seemingly disparate forces that are driving this holocaust.
The occult activity surrounding the abortion industry is exposed with numerous examples. But are these just aberrations, bizarre yet anomalous examples of abortionists who just happen to have ties to modern day witchcraft? Or is this representative of something deeper, more sinister and even endemic to the entire abortion movement?
As the allusion to the film of over a decade ago suggests, the viewer may learn that things are not always as they appear to be. The Abortion Matrix reveals the reality of child-killing and strikes the proper moral chord to move hearts to fulfill the biblical responsibility to rescue those unjustly sentenced to death and to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves (Proverbs 24:11,12; 31:8,9).
Speakers include: George Grant, Peter Hammond, RC Sproul Jr., Paul Jehle, Lou Engle, Rusty Thomas, Flip Benham, Janet Porter and many more.
Ten parts, over three hours of instruction!
Running Time: 195 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“When the lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing.” – President Ronald Reagan to National Religious Broadcasters Convention, January 1981
Ronald Reagan became convinced of this as a result of watching The Silent Scream – a movie he considered so powerful and convicting that he screened it at the White House.
The modern technology of real-time ultrasound now reveals the actual responses of a 12-week old fetus to being aborted. As the unborn child attempts to escape the abortionist’s suction curette, her motions can be seen to become desperately agitated and her heart rate doubles. Her mouth opens – as if to scream – but no sound can come out. Her scream doesn’t have to remain silent, however … not if you will become her voice. This newly re-mastered version features eight language tracks and two bonus videos.
“… a high technology “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” arousing public opinion just as Harriet Beecher Stowe’s 1852 antislavery novel ignited the abolitionist movement.” – Sen. Gordon Humphrey, Time Magazine
Languages: English, Spanish, French, South Korean, Chinese, Russian, Portuguese, Japanese
Running Time: 28 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)