By Editorial Staff
Published January 1, 1988
News Service 2000 Commentary
by David Aikman
When an obscure peanut farmer from Plains, Georgia, offered himself as a candidate for the democratic nomination for the presidency in 1976, the only surprising part of his Renaissance-style resume (farmer, businessman, nuclear engineer, naval officer, etc.) was the listing of the profession “Christian” along with all the others.
What did he mean, inquired the bemused but curious Washington press corps that had been unleashed upon this particular candidate? Southern Baptist, okay, but Christian? Was this some new church denomination?
When Carter obligingly explained that he was a “born-again” Christian – the quotation marks are still obligatory in the nation’s major newspapers – the curiosity turned to bafflement. What strange beast was that? A snake-handler, perhaps, or something to do with Billy Graham? In capital cities around the world American foreign correspondents confessed to their Japanese friends that they, too, couldn’t understand what a “born-again Christian” was.
Jimmy Carter, as everyone now knows, survived this first bout with the provinciality of the nation’s major newspaper reporters. In fact, he enjoyed the last laugh by winning a decisive majority among the nation’s evangelical voters in the 1976 general election, even though his margin of victory nationally was a razor-thin two percent.
But there was little for most of us to smirk about. At a time when, according to the pollster George Gallup, some 40 million Americans described themselves as “born again,” the term was obviously as unfamiliar to most American news reporters as the Tibetan Book of the Dead.
In a vague effort to push the concept of a large, grass-roots American evangelical community out of sight and mind, therefore, much of the media resorted to the safe old standby term for people of religious conviction: they were “fundamentalists.” The word, with its unmistakable odor of uncouthness and fanaticism, had the useful effect of consigning evangelicals to the category of the unreportable: what they believed somehow shouldn’t be taken seriously; and anyway, they were all rather tedious.
America’s “fundamentalists,” however, wouldn’t conveniently go away. Having supported Jimmy Carter, they then demonstrated an annoying unpredictability in 1980 by deserting him in droves to vote for his Republican opponent, Ronald Reagan. And they kept growing. A 1985 Gallup testing of evangelical Christians found that the 40 million, in less than a decade, had grown to some 90 million. Other studies confirmed the findings: 94 percent of Americans believed in a personal God, 40 percent or more attended church weekly, and by every other criterion, America was a far more religious country in the 1980’s than it had been for decades.
All of these developments were barely noticed by the American media. Even such tell-tale signs as a consistent growth in American missionaries being sent overseas, failed to alert the vast majority of the nation’s reporters to the unique phenomenon taking place in their midst, namely, one of the most dramatic nationwide increases in evangelical Christian belief for nearly a century.
Overseas, of course, the rapid growth of Christian churches in the Third World escaped notice altogether on the part of the stars of investigative journalism. It was not until the overthrow of the Shah of Iran in 1979, the U.S. hostage crisis, and the Ayatollah Khomeini’s export of his radical Islamic views that consciousness began to dawn. Something, obviously, was afoot within Islam. Of course, it must be fundamentalism!
The failure to observe at all, not to mention to analyze and explain, the rise of evangelical Christianity in the U.S. over a period of two decades must constitute one of the great modern blind spots of the American journalistic mind. It is a failure sadly paralleled by the inability of Western reporters during the same period to grasp the scope of the Khomeinyist Islamic revival, or the dangerous reverberations of a renascent Islam, even among Muslim communities around the world not belonging to the minority Shi’ite sect of Islam dominant in Iran.
Finally, there is a third media failure in the category of modern faiths, that of not explaining how the 20th century’s great secular religion, Marxism, has continued to attract Third World adherents when its economic tenets have been universally demonstrated to be false.
This singular media blindness has had all sorts of unpleasant consequences, and not just among American evangelicals who have had to endure the many prejudices – born of ignorance – that swoop around the public marketplace. Americans as a whole, have been short-changed by those whose job is to report the news and analyze events around the world. They have been kept in the dark about one of the great stories of the century, the emergence of a growing, perhaps mortal competition among the world’s great religions for the ultimate loyalties of mankind.
Why has the U.S. press failed so conspicuously to do justice to this phenomenon? An ordinary explanation would be ignorance. But the fact is that the ignorance is at least partly wilful. Survey after survey of the U.S. media has confirmed one overwhelming fact: U.S. reporters tend to be overwhelmingly secular in their worldview, they tend not to respect religious faith in general, and they for the most part espouse a system of values that is inherently hostile to the traditional Western values handed down in the Bible.
In a well-known survey of 216 leading U.S. journalists conducted in 1981 by sociologists S. Robert Lichter and Stanley Rothman, 54 percent of the respondents thought adultery was not wrong, 75 percent considered homosexuality an acceptable life-style, 86 percent seldom or never went to church or synagogue, and 90 percent thought that abortion was an inherent right of women.
If those figures are frightening for Christians, they are likely to be even more strikingly skewed away from traditional values today than 6 years ago. Of course, the recent string of scandals and internecine squabbles within the evangelical community has not made the task of reporting sympathetically about it any easier. In fact, U.S. news organizations have at times displayed open hostility towards any Christian organization with a high profile and explicit evangelical positions, tarring much of Christendom with the opprobrium earned by only a small part of it.
In so doing, some journalists have departed from one of the first principles of their professional code of ethics: keeping personal likes and dislikes out of the business of reporting. They have, though, departed from a more important principle as well: being curious about life, and open-minded enough to ask a lot of questions. In theory, that’s what journalists are supposed to do all along.
Is there a Christian solution to this? Yes, there is. But if it is simple, it is not easy. For years, Christians have been content to drift along with the changing fashions of trendy whims of the general populace. They have been confident that there isn’t too much difference between Christian and non-Christian standards and behavior in private life and society.
That confidence is utterly misplaced in today’s climate. If God’s people are not to be completely swamped by the evolution of much of modern culture into barbarism and neo-paganism, then they must fashion the instruments of their own cultural expression, including their news media, for themselves. Otherwise, they will be unable to accomplish the very first thing, to discern the signs of the times. This refashioning includes, in a manner of speaking, re-inventing journalism, and applying to it the biblical standards evangelical Christians demand of their own and other Christians’ private lives.
Little by little, in such outstanding locations as CBN University’s journalism program, or in the Communications program of Youth With a Mission, this is being done. But until journalism as a whole has been significantly redeemed from its present sunken worldliness, one of the great stories of the millennium – how more people than ever before are finding Christ – is going to be lost to the world at large.
Forerunner - Home » The Forerunner Newspaper » National Events
Your comments are welcome!
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Who is the dreaded beast of Revelation?
Now at last, a plausible candidate for this personification of evil incarnate has been identified (or re-identified). Ken Gentry’s insightful analysis of scripture and history is likely to revolutionize your understanding of the book of Revelation — and even more importantly — amplify and energize your entire Christian worldview!
Historical footage and other graphics are used to illustrate the lecture Dr. Gentry presented at the 1999 Ligonier Conference in Orlando, Florida. It is followed by a one-hour question and answer session addressing the key concerns and objections typically raised in response to his position. This presentation also features an introduction that touches on not only the confusion and controversy surrounding this issue — but just why it may well be one of the most significant issues facing the Church today.
Ideal for group meetings, personal Bible study — for anyone who wants to understand the historical context of John’s famous letter “… to the seven churches which are in Asia.” (Revelation 1:4)
Running Time: 145 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“Give me liberty or give me death!”
Patrick Henry’s famous declaration not only helped launch the War for Independence, it also perfectly summarized the mindset that gave birth to, and sustained, the unprecedented experiment in Christian liberty that was America.
The freedom our Founders envisioned was not freedom from suffering, want, or hard work. Nor was it freedom to indulge every appetite or whim without restraint—that would merely be servitude to a different master. No, the Founders’ passion was to live free before God, unfettered by the chains of autocracy, shackles that slowly but inexorably bind men when the governments they fashion fail to recognize and uphold freedom’s singular, foundational truth: that all men are created in the image of God, and are thereby co-equally endowed with the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
This presentation is a similar call, not to one but many. By reintroducing the principles of freedom that gave birth to America, it is our prayer that Jesus, the true and only ruler over the nations, will once again be our acknowledged Sovereign, that we may again know and exult in the great truth that “where the Spirit of the LORD is, there is liberty” (2 Cor. 3:17).
Welcome to the Second American Revolution!
This DVD features “Liberty: The Model of Christian Liberty” along with “Dawn’s Early Light: A Brief History of America’s Christian Foundations.” Bonus features include a humorous but instructive collection of campaign ads and Eric Holmberg’s controversial YouTube challenge concerning Mitt Romney’s campaign for president.
$14.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
With “preaching to the lost” being such a basic foundation of Christianity, why do many in the church seem to be apathetic on this issue of preaching in highways and byways of towns and cities?
Is it biblical to stand in the public places of the world and proclaim the gospel, regardless if people want to hear it or not?
Does the Bible really call church pastors, leaders and evangelists to proclaim the gospel in the public square as part of obedience to the Great Commission, or is public preaching something that is outdated and not applicable for our day and age?
These any many other questions are answered in this documentary.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)