By P. Andrew Sandlin
Published May 1, 2008
People ignorant of history are at a serious disadvantage in assessing ideas, philosophies, teachings, ideologies, and movements. They often have the bad habit of thinking their beliefs and practices are somehow historic, and that anybody who introduces different ideas and practices must of necessity be inventing something new. We might call this trait modernistic elitist snobbery. These are the people who quite often read only twentieth-century books, and automatically think anything recent must be right.
Perhaps no group is more guilty of this modernistic elitist provincialism than contemporary Christians. It appears as though many believe church history began in 1920. If anybody brings up Puritan, medieval, English Baptist, or Protestant ideas from an earlier time, he is charged with introducing some new doctrine. The provincialists, poor souls, have never escaped from Plato’s cave.
Some examples: some who hold to the necessity of an “altar call” somehow feel that those orthodox Christians who oppose it are somehow “modernistic”; but quite the opposite is true: from the standpoint of church history, the “anxious seat” is a modernistic invention. All students of church history should know that this practice-invented probably by Charles Finney or someone contemporary to him and calculated to procure immediate results and circumvent the operation of the Holy Spirit (Finney, interestingly enough, did not believe regeneration was a supernatural work; thus the Holy Spirit was not needed)-was known no time before the nineteenth century. It was not found in the early church, the patristic church, the medieval church, or the Protestant church. It is not supported by the Bible; it is not supported by history. It is, consequently, a modern invention. My point is not to oppose “altar calls,” but to confute the contention of some adherents of this practice that deviation from it is some modern invention.
The advent of “house churches” may be the wave of the future. Those tenaciously embracing the institutional church sometimes give the impression there is something “mod” about the house-church movement.
They haven’t been reading their Bibles. New Testament evidence reveals clearly that in the early-church period there were no other churches but house churches; and if there were others, they are not mentioned. The only thing modernistic in connection with the house-church movement is the ideas of those so tied to the institutional church that they can’t (apparently) read the New Testament. We may solidly surmise that affection of Christians for buildings is a Roman Catholic sentiment. No one, of course, denies that before the rise of Roman Catholicism churches did meet in buildings larger than houses-or at least in very large houses; notwithstanding, the preoccupation with church buildings seems to coincide all too obviously with the Roman Catholic infatuation with “cathedrals of worship,” icons, and “sacramental beauty.” This opinion may be difficult to prove, but it is probably even more difficult to disprove. But to suggest to modern Christians that their preference for church buildings over house churches may reflect Romish ideas rather than the New Testament Faith is likely to invite emotional (but insupportable) outbursts of opposition. To them, old (meeting in houses) is new, since it is new to their provincial minds.
Many of the Church of Christ and Baptist persuasion perceive any deviation from their cherished denominational title as some modern invention. Some from both denominational groups are even convinced their titles are somehow Biblical! They may as well admit, however, that, from the evidence we have in the New Testament, no churches had any titles whatsoever, “Baptist” or “Church of Christ” or anything else. The fact that “churches of Christ” or “churches of God” appears in the Bible in no way indicates these were names given to them. To the best of our knowledge, New Testament churches did not have names of any kind. But those of each persuasion who are convinced the name is so important will nonetheless admit the most important aspect of their Faith is not their name but their doctrine. Oddly enough, however, these same people dislike the idea of deviation from their name!
But they can’t have it both ways. Either these names were not titles from New Testament churches and the doctrine is most important, or the name and title are more important than the doctrine no matter what the New Testament says. They do not prefer to affirm the latter, because it may give rise to accusations that they no longer affirm the authority of the Bible. So they play both sides of the fence. Consequently, they may charge that a return to New Testament ideas constitutes “modernism”; but they don’t realize that the attachment to church titles is a relatively late invention in church history. According to those standards, they are the “modernists.”
Beware when old is new and new is old.
Forerunner - Home » The Puritan Storm
Your comments are welcome!
Exposes the Dangers of Abortion to Women!
These shocking eyewitness accounts expose the dangers of abortion not only to unborn children, but to the health and lives women as well. An antidote to the smokescreens of the liberal media, these short clips show what really happens in and around abortion clinics.
Although the content is emotionally gut-wrenching, these videos have been used in church seminars and small groups to educate Christians on the abortion issue and to lead people toward a pro-life position. Contains 2 hours and 40 minutes of materials that can be shown separately.
Watch these pro-life videos on-line.
“These videos helped change my mind from pro-choice to pro-life. Your videos are what did it for me. I will be walking in next year’s March For Life in San Francisco.” — A. Jackson, California
“I was going to have an abortion until I saw your video. Praise Jesus!”
— M. Drew, YouTube Commenter
$4.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“Give me liberty or give me death!”
Patrick Henry’s famous declaration not only helped launch the War for Independence, it also perfectly summarized the mindset that gave birth to, and sustained, the unprecedented experiment in Christian liberty that was America.
The freedom our Founders envisioned was not freedom from suffering, want, or hard work. Nor was it freedom to indulge every appetite or whim without restraint—that would merely be servitude to a different master. No, the Founders’ passion was to live free before God, unfettered by the chains of autocracy, shackles that slowly but inexorably bind men when the governments they fashion fail to recognize and uphold freedom’s singular, foundational truth: that all men are created in the image of God, and are thereby co-equally endowed with the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
This presentation is a similar call, not to one but many. By reintroducing the principles of freedom that gave birth to America, it is our prayer that Jesus, the true and only ruler over the nations, will once again be our acknowledged Sovereign, that we may again know and exult in the great truth that “where the Spirit of the LORD is, there is liberty” (2 Cor. 3:17).
Welcome to the Second American Revolution!
This DVD features “Liberty: The Model of Christian Liberty” along with “Dawn’s Early Light: A Brief History of America’s Christian Foundations.” Bonus features include a humorous but instructive collection of campaign ads and Eric Holmberg’s controversial YouTube challenge concerning Mitt Romney’s campaign for president.
$14.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
With “preaching to the lost” being such a basic foundation of Christianity, why do many in the church seem to be apathetic on this issue of preaching in highways and byways of towns and cities?
Is it biblical to stand in the public places of the world and proclaim the gospel, regardless if people want to hear it or not?
Does the Bible really call church pastors, leaders and evangelists to proclaim the gospel in the public square as part of obedience to the Great Commission, or is public preaching something that is outdated and not applicable for our day and age?
These any many other questions are answered in this documentary.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“When the lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing.” – President Ronald Reagan to National Religious Broadcasters Convention, January 1981
Ronald Reagan became convinced of this as a result of watching The Silent Scream – a movie he considered so powerful and convicting that he screened it at the White House.
The modern technology of real-time ultrasound now reveals the actual responses of a 12-week old fetus to being aborted. As the unborn child attempts to escape the abortionist’s suction curette, her motions can be seen to become desperately agitated and her heart rate doubles. Her mouth opens – as if to scream – but no sound can come out. Her scream doesn’t have to remain silent, however … not if you will become her voice. This newly re-mastered version features eight language tracks and two bonus videos.
“…a high technology “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” arousing public opinion just as Harriet Beecher Stowe’s 1852 antislavery novel ignited the abolitionist movement.” – Sen. Gordon Humphrey, Time Magazine
Languages: English, Spanish, French, South Korean, Chinese, Russian, Portuguese, Japanese
Running Time: 28 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)