By Jay Rogers
Published May 1, 2008
When many people hear talk of building a “biblical” or a “Christian” nation, they equate this idea with a civil government run by the Church. When non-Christians hear us talk about gaining political influence, they are afraid. Liberals fear the Church taking over government because they correctly understand that a nation run by a particular church or religion could lead us to tyranny.
Liberals are more likely to think of a “theocracy” as a state run by the Church, than as a Christian Republic, the form of government the founders of our nation intended. They do not understand that our goal is not a state run by the Church, but a nation that accepts and honors Biblical Law. Therefore, liberals (and especially the liberal media) are likely to misrepresent our goals when we speak of building a Christian nation.
A biblically based state does not imply the domination of the state by the Church. To the contrary, it implies a godly separation of powers. It assumes that men (even Christians) are capable of great evil and that the powers of government should be limited and separated. A Christian nation is based on the principle that civil government ought to be founded on the moral laws found in the Bible. Therefore, the issue for which we ought to be contending is the place of Biblical Law in civil government. This is the true path to building a Christian nation.
We should not advocate an ecclesiocracy – a nation run by the Church, but a theocracy – a nation ruled by God and God’s laws. There have been many ecclesiocracies (states run by the church) throughout history. Some were successful, but most ended in tyranny. This was due to the failure of sinful men, however, and not the fault of Biblical Law. There have been several successful theocracies – states based on Biblical Law – in history. The Netherlands during the term of Abraham Kuyper, Oliver Cromwell’s term as Lord Protector of England, and the governments of the American Puritan colonies are examples of some successful theocracies.
The Puritans of Massachusetts set a pattern of local self-government that was a natural extension of their congregational church government, a pattern imitated throughout the colonies and later by our U.S. Constitution. Thomas Hooker, helped found a new colony at Hartford, and assisted in the drafting and adoption of the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut in 1639.
Harvard historian John Fiske writes: “It was the first written constitution known to history, that created a government, and it marked the beginnings of the American republic, of which Thomas Hooker deserves more than any other man to be called the father. The government of the United States today is in lineal descent more nearly related to that of Connecticut than to that of any of the other thirteen colonies. The most noteworthy feature of the Connecticut republic was that it was a federation of independent towns, and that all attributes of sovereignty not expressly granted to the General Court remained, as of original right, in the towns.”
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut is one example of a biblical covenant with God which also served as a basis for civil government. This document states that Connecticut was submitted to the “Savior and Lord.” Connecticut began as a true federal union under God, perhaps the first since the days of the Hebrew Commonwealth.
Later, the Preamble to the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights (1780) made it clear that the state was under the authority and rule of God: “We, therefore, the people of Massachusetts, acknowledging, with grateful hearts, the goodness of the Great Legislator of the Universe, in affording us, in the course of His providence, an opportunity, deliberately and peaceably, without fraud, violence or surprise, of entering into an original, explicit, and solemn compact with each other; and of forming a new Constitution of Civil Government, for ourselves and posterity, and devoutly imploring His direction in so interesting a design, Do agree upon, ordain and establish, the following Declaration of Rights, and Frame of Government, as the Constitution of Massachusetts.”
We should understand that this model will not lead us to “utopia” – or a perfect society – but is a necessary first step in successful nation building. We should also understand that the most advanced model for government is not “democracy.” A democracy implies majority rule – or even “mob” rule. This can lead to tyranny of the majority over the minority. The most advanced model for government is a Christian republic: a representative government which protects the God-given inalienable rights of minorities while recognizing Biblical law as the basis for all legislation and civil authority.
Building a Christian Republic does not require all of its citizens – or even a majority – to belong to the same denomination. It only requires some standard of orthodoxy to be held by the majority of its citizens: a common creed or confession based on the bare minimum standard for what it means to be a Christian. For instance, Reformed Protestants, Baptists, Pentecostals, Charismatics, Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics can agree on the first four ecumenical creeds of the church (Apostles, Nicene, Athanasian and Chalcedonian) and they can agree on the standard of Biblical Law for ruling a society.
There will still be disagreements on how God’s Law is to be applied in many cases, but these disagreements would exist in a representative government in which Christians were the civil rulers. Protestants would gladly accept the rule of righteous Roman Catholic representatives (and vice versa) if the only other alternative was rule by the “lewd left.”
Building a Christian nation assumes that a large portion of the population would be truly converted. It assumes that members of each church and denomination would work hard to get their representatives elected to office. It would also imply the idea religious liberty or freedom of religious conscience as a God-given human right. In other words, there would be no establishment of a particular Christian religion by the state. It assumes that the Church would rule by training civil rulers in their knowledge of the Bible, but would not rule with civil powers directly.
I look for a day when our government, from the city council up to the U.S. Congress and presidency is occupied by people like Matthew Carroll, Steve Beltz and Helen Voltz (Christians recently elected to the Melbourne City Council and the County Commission). This level of success is not an impossibility, but it does imply a national revival in our churches to precede or accompany reformation of government.
Building a biblical state is possible in other nations of the world as well. The current national government of Zambia is run by Christians and has a Constitution which recognizes Biblical Law as the basis for government and Jesus Christ as Lord. This could also happen in the former Soviet Union, in China, and in many Third World countries. Considering the growth of churches in these nations, the success of theocratic government may come even sooner than in America!
It is possible to build a Christian nation. In fact, the Great Commission given by our Lord, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations” (Matt. 28:18-20), commands that we should now be busy doing this very thing!
Forerunner - Home » Pass The Word » Pass The Word - January/February 1997
Your comments are welcome!
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“When the lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing.” – President Ronald Reagan to National Religious Broadcasters Convention, January 1981
Ronald Reagan became convinced of this as a result of watching The Silent Scream – a movie he considered so powerful and convicting that he screened it at the White House. More recently, it was by catching just a glimpse of what this film reveals that Planned Parenthood director and abortion advocate Abby Johnson turned and became a strong advocate for the pre-born.
The modern technology of real-time ultrasound now reveals the actual responses of a 12-week old fetus to being aborted. As the unborn child attempts to escape the abortionist’s suction curette, her motions can be seen to become desperately agitated and her heart rate doubles. Her mouth opens – as if to scream – but no sound can come out. Her scream doesn’t have to remain silent, however … not if you will become her voice. This newly re-mastered version features eight language tracks and two bonus videos.
“…a high technology “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” arousing public opinion just as Harriet Beecher Stowe’s 1852 antislavery novel ignited the abolitionist movement.” – Sen. Gordon Humphrey, Time Magazine
Languages: English, Spanish, French, South Korean, Chinese, Russian, Portuguese, Japanese
Running Time: 28 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the free Study Guide!
Is there a connection between pagan religion and the abortion industry?
This powerful presentation traces the biblical roots of child sacrifice and then delves into the social, political and cultural fall-out that this sin against God and crime against humanity has produced in our beleaguered society.
Conceived as a sequel and update to the 1988 classic, The Massacre of Innocence, the new title, The Abortion Matrix, is entirely fitting. It not only references abortion’s specific target – the sacred matrix where human beings are formed in the womb in the very image of God, but it also implies the existence of a conspiracy, a matrix of seemingly disparate forces that are driving this holocaust.
The occult activity surrounding the abortion industry is exposed with numerous examples. But are these just aberrations, bizarre yet anomalous examples of abortionists who just happen to have ties to modern day witchcraft? Or is this representative of something deeper, more sinister and even endemic to the entire abortion movement?
As the allusion to the film of over a decade ago suggests, the viewer may learn that things are not always as they appear to be. The Abortion Matrix reveals the reality of child-killing and strikes the proper moral chord to move hearts to fulfill the biblical responsibility to rescue those unjustly sentenced to death and to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves (Proverbs 24:11,12; 31:8,9).
Speakers include: George Grant, Peter Hammond, RC Sproul Jr., Paul Jehle, Lou Engle, Rusty Thomas, Flip Benham, Janet Porter and many more.
Ten parts, over three hours of instruction!
Running Time: 195 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
That Swiss Hermit Strikes Again!
Dr. Schaeffer, who was one of the most influential Christian thinkers in the twentieth century, shows that secular humanism has displaced the Judeo-Christian consensus that once defined our nation’s moral boundaries. Law, education, and medicine have all been reshaped for the worse as a consequence. America’s dominant worldview changed, Schaeffer charges, when Christians weren’t looking.
Schaeffer lists two reasons for evangelical indifference: a false concept of spirituality and fear. He calls on believers to stand against the tyranny and moral chaos that come when humanism reigns-and warns that believers may, at some point, be forced to make the hard choice between obeying God or Caesar. A Christian Manifesto is a thought-provoking and bracing Christian analysis of American culture and the obligation Christians have to engage the culture with the claims of Christ.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)