By Jay Rogers
Published November 1, 1993
Federal court decides in favor of pro-lifers
MELBOURNE, Florida (FR) – In a major victory for pro-life activists, a federal appeals court ruled that a court ordered injunction against pro-lifers at a Melbourne abortion clinic infringed on freedom of speech. The court said that the order issued by Circuit Judge Robert McGregor should be lifted. In April, McGregor created a buffer zone around the Aware Woman abortion clinic in Melbourne that kept pro-life demonstrators from getting too close. About 150 pro-lifers were arrested earlier this year for violating the court order. (The Forerunner April/May 1993, “Christians Are Arrested For Praying.”)
The federal court noted that Judge McGregor created a criminal statue prohibiting “pro-life free speech activity in a certain geographical location.” Because the injunction contained “viewpoint specific” discrimination (i.e., it prohibited only pro-life free speech) it was deemed unconstitutional. This decision has monumental importance in the legal war over abortion and will be used as a precedent in arguing similar cases all over the country.
The appeal was won by Matthew D. Staver, attorney and president of the Liberty Counsel. Staver’s case was argued on behalf of Myrna Cheffer, an Orlando area pro-life activist. Cheffer was not among the 150 pro-life individuals who were arrested for entering the buffer zone. Nevertheless, she filed this suit in federal district court seeking to prohibit enforcement of the state court injunction. Cheffer claimed that the injunction acted as a prior restraint on her free speech rights and that the threat of arrest chilled her ability to exercise these rights. The federal appeals court ruled in favor of Cheffer and handed the order back down to the district court recommending that it be repealed.
According to Staver: “It’s a landmark decision. This particular order is one of the strongest of its kind as it relates to abortion picketing and free speech. It specifically indicates that this injunction is viewpoint oriented, content specific and it violates free speech. It is also significant as it relates to the buffer zone legislation that was going to be before the Florida legislature next week placing 50-foot buffer zones around abortion clinics and the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances bill on the federal level. This decision will clearly allow suits against those type of buffer zone restrictions. This particular injunction goes way beyond trying to restrict trespass or things of that nature. It restricts picketing that occurs within a traditional sidewalk, highway, residential area.
“We now have a conflict in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on the federal level and the Florida Supreme Court in their interpretation. That will be very strong basis on which the United States Supreme Court could accept this case on the appeal. In the meantime, we will ask the federal court to block the continued enforcement of this injunction. I would also caution the city of Melbourne Police Department from making arrests of people while they are within that 36-foot buffer zone because I think they tread a very thine line upon which they could be sued under this federal court ruling for deprivation of individual civil rights.”
The following are excerpts from Chief Judge Gerald Tjoflat’s decision: “Perhaps few Americans are content with the current legal status of abortion in America. Many see a woman’s ability to choose abortion as a part of her fundamental constitutional right to self-determination that is ill-protected by wavering jurisprudence by the Supreme Court. Many others see the 1.4 million abortions each year as an American Holocaust permitted by the moral vacillation of the government. This case arises out of the clash of these opposing beliefs, and governmental attempts to restrict their free expression.
“On April 8, 1993, Judge McGregor issued an Amended Permanent Injunction in which he enjoined certain activities of Operation Rescue and others in a court-drawn ‘buffer zone’ surrounding the abortion clinic…. On its face, the injunction appears to ‘criminalize’ various acts of peaceful protest, including the mere penetration of the buffer zone by anyone acting ‘in concert’ with those named in the injunction … The local police understood the injunction to require them to arrest ‘pro-life’ individuals who violated the buffer zone.
“An injunction is an extraordinary remedy that operates only on the parties before the court. Legislation operates more broadly, extending to all actors within the legislature’s jurisdiction. Nevertheless, when Judge McGregor issued the Amended Permanent Injunction in the state case, he, in effect, created a criminal statute prohibiting ‘pro-life’ free speech in a certain geographical location. But by extending the injunction to nonparties and by attaching criminal penalties otherwise protected by the Constitution, Judge McGregor crafted a law…. We refuse to prefer form over substance; the injunction has all the attributes of a criminal statute and we will treat it accordingly….
“That free speech restrictions at issue here are viewpoint-based cannot be seriously doubted. Such a restriction is no more viewpoint-neutral than one restricting the speech of ‘the Republican Party, the state Republican Party, George Bush, Bob Dole, Jack Kemp and all persons acting in concert with them or on their behalf.’ The practical effect of this section of the injunction was to assure that while ‘pro-life’ speakers would be arrested, ‘pro-choice’ demonstrators would not. A viewpoint-specific restriction in a traditional public forum is unconstitutional….
“The Supreme Court has noted that ‘[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.’ This is apparently precisely what occurred. Several of those arrested testified that they were designated for arrest by clinic workers and police officers because they were perceived to be ‘pro-life.’ Judge McGregor accepted this interpretation of the intent of the injunction and explained (to the arrestees): ‘[T]he injunction did not pertain to those on the other side of the issue, because the word “in concert with” means in concert with those who had taken a certain position in respect to the clinic, adverse to the clinic. If you are saying that is the selective basis that the pro-choice were not arrested when pro-life was arrested, that’s the basis of the selection….’
“It is tempting, of course, to entertain the argument that the speech in this case is disruptive, discourteous, and offensive, but that is irrelevant…. We protect much that offends in the name of free speech – we cannot refuse such protection to those who find abortion morally reprehensible. The district court treated the state court injunction as an ordinary injunction when it had the effect of a criminal statute. Consequently, the order of the district court was founded on a mistake of law. We vacate the order, and remand for further consideration of the issuance of a preliminary injunction in light of this opinion.
“IT IS SO ORDERED.”
Forerunner - Home » The Forerunner Newspaper » Pro-life Articles
Your comments are welcome!
That Swiss Hermit Strikes Again!
Dr. Schaeffer, who was one of the most influential Christian thinkers in the twentieth century, shows that secular humanism has displaced the Judeo-Christian consensus that once defined our nation’s moral boundaries. Law, education, and medicine have all been reshaped for the worse as a consequence. America’s dominant worldview changed, Schaeffer charges, when Christians weren’t looking.
Schaeffer lists two reasons for evangelical indifference: a false concept of spirituality and fear. He calls on believers to stand against the tyranny and moral chaos that come when humanism reigns-and warns that believers may, at some point, be forced to make the hard choice between obeying God or Caesar. A Christian Manifesto is a thought-provoking and bracing Christian analysis of American culture and the obligation Christians have to engage the culture with the claims of Christ.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
God’s Law and Society powerfully presents a comprehensive worldview based upon the ethical system found in the Law of God.
Speakers include: R.J. Rushdoony, George Grant, Howard Phillips, R.C. Sproul Jr., Ken Gentry, Gary DeMar, Jay Grimstead, Steven Schlissel, Andrew Sandlin, Eric Holmberg, and more!
Sixteen Christian leaders and scholars answer some of the most common questions and misconceptions related to this volatile issue:
1. Are we under Law or under Grace?
2. Does the Old Testament Law apply today?
3. Can we legislate morality?
4. What are the biblical foundations of government?
5. Was America founded as a Christian nation?
6. What about the separation of Church and State?
7. Is neutrality a myth?
8. What about non-Christians and the Law of God?
9. Would there be “freedom” in a Christian republic?
10. What would a “Christian America” look like?
Perfect for group instruction as well as personal Bible study.
Ten parts, over four hours of instruction!
Running Time: 240 minutes
Watch over 60 on-line video interviews from God’s Law and Society.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Foundations in Biblical Eschatology
By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.
All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.
$12.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the free Study Guide!
Is there a connection between pagan religion and the abortion industry?
This powerful presentation traces the biblical roots of child sacrifice and then delves into the social, political and cultural fall-out that this sin against God and crime against humanity has produced in our beleaguered society.
Conceived as a sequel and update to the 1988 classic, The Massacre of Innocence, the new title, The Abortion Matrix, is entirely fitting. It not only references abortion’s specific target – the sacred matrix where human beings are formed in the womb in the very image of God, but it also implies the existence of a conspiracy, a matrix of seemingly disparate forces that are driving this holocaust.
The occult activity surrounding the abortion industry is exposed with numerous examples. But are these just aberrations, bizarre yet anomalous examples of abortionists who just happen to have ties to modern day witchcraft? Or is this representative of something deeper, more sinister and even endemic to the entire abortion movement?
As the allusion to the film of over a decade ago suggests, the viewer may learn that things are not always as they appear to be. The Abortion Matrix reveals the reality of child-killing and strikes the proper moral chord to move hearts to fulfill the biblical responsibility to rescue those unjustly sentenced to death and to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves (Proverbs 24:11,12; 31:8,9).
Speakers include: George Grant, Peter Hammond, RC Sproul Jr., Paul Jehle, Lou Engle, Rusty Thomas, Flip Benham, Janet Porter and many more.
Ten parts, over three hours of instruction!
Running Time: 195 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“When the lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing.” – President Ronald Reagan to National Religious Broadcasters Convention, January 1981
Ronald Reagan became convinced of this as a result of watching The Silent Scream – a movie he considered so powerful and convicting that he screened it at the White House.
The modern technology of real-time ultrasound now reveals the actual responses of a 12-week old fetus to being aborted. As the unborn child attempts to escape the abortionist’s suction curette, her motions can be seen to become desperately agitated and her heart rate doubles. Her mouth opens – as if to scream – but no sound can come out. Her scream doesn’t have to remain silent, however … not if you will become her voice. This newly re-mastered version features eight language tracks and two bonus videos.
“… a high technology “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” arousing public opinion just as Harriet Beecher Stowe’s 1852 antislavery novel ignited the abolitionist movement.” – Sen. Gordon Humphrey, Time Magazine
Languages: English, Spanish, French, South Korean, Chinese, Russian, Portuguese, Japanese
Running Time: 28 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)