By Editorial Staff
Published October 1, 1988
“I’m a strong Democrat, a liberal Democrat .”
- Michael Dukakis
As the National Democratic party meets in Atlanta to nominate Michael Dukakis, they are about to adopt a short, vague platform heavy on rhetoric but light on specifics. In fact it is so vague as to beg the question:
What are they hiding from the American people?
Apparently, they are not renouncing the ultra-liberal platforms adopted by every National Democratic Convention since George McGovern was nominated in 1972. Certainly, they are not repudiating the liberal special interest groups that dominated the 1984 Mondale convention. Clearly, they are not rejecting the dangerous policies that led to the failure of the Carter Administration.
Obviously, they are hoping the American people will forget their extremist policies and believe they have changed. And truly, they should harbor that hope.
But the plan has gone awry. The problem is their nominee for President – Michael Dukakis. He is liberal in the extreme and his record shows it.
The Dukakis Record is something to hide from the American people. It is everything voters have rejected in recent elections. It is soft on crime, weak on defense, naive on foreign policy, permissive toward drugs, strong on taxes, and it rejects traditional family values.
They don’t want you to see it, and we can understand why. But the American people have a right to know something of the beliefs and values of this man who would be President.
So here it is – the Dukakis Record.
“I’m a card-carrying member of the American Civil Liberties Union.”
New York Magazine
- Opposes capital punishment under any circumstances
- Supported unsupervised weekend leave for first degree murderers serving life terms without parole
- On average, released a first degree murderer in Massachusetts on furlough each day for the past seven years
- Strong opponent of gun ownership and opposed compensating gun owners whose guns would be confiscated
- Between 1975 and 1978, commuted the sentences of 37 convicted murderers and set them free, a record for the state
“The Governor’s compassion is very pronounced toward criminals, but scarcely visible towards the victims of crime.”
- Paul Craig Roberts
The Washington Times
“Balancing the budget would require hard choices mostly on the defense side. I don’t see much room for cuts on the domestic side.”
- Michael Dukakis
- Opposes the Midgetman Missile
- Opposed the development of Cruise Missiles and the deployment of the Persian Missile
- Opposed the Trident Submarine
- Opposes the development of a 600-ship Navy
- Opposes testing and deployment of anti-satellite weapons – weapons even Walter Mondale supported
- Refused to allow Massachusetts National Guard to go to Central America for two week training until ordered to do so by Federal Court
- Opposes development of new, fast aircraft carriers
- Opposed the introduction of every new strategic defense system during the Reagan and Carter Administrations
“In a Michael Dukakis Administration, national security is not a commitment; it is a retreat.”
- Senator Strom Thurmond
“The way to stop the arms race is to stop building and testing nuclear weapons.”
- Michael Dukakis
- Opposed invasion of Grenada
- Failed to timely support anti-terrorist military action in Libya
- Opposes U.S. efforts to keep open sea lanes in Persian Gulf
- Opposes aid to freedom fighters in Nicaragua and Angola
- Opposed sending U.S. troops to Honduras in response to the Nicaraguan invasion
- Stated that the Monroe Doctrine has been superseded
- Active participant in the liberal nuclear freeze movement in the early 1980’s
- Failed to support any effort in the last 8 years to resist Soviet aggression or Communist expansion
“… his approach to foreign policy comes so close to renouncing the unilateral use of American power to protect national interests … that it sometimes sounds as if the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt had taken control of his body.”
- David Broder
The Washington Post
“I’ve never done drugs, but I certainly understand why some people try it.”
- Michael Dukakis
The Baltimore Sun
- Vetoed mandatory sentencing for major drug dealers in 1978
- Opposes the death penalty for drug kingpins
- Allows first time drug offenders to go free on probation
- Allows drug dealers to receive weekend furloughs in Massachusetts
- Doubled the number of furloughs for drug offenders during his second term as Governor
- Kitty Dukakis stated that the United States should weigh legalizing certain drugs
“At best, Mike Dukakis joined the fight against drugs after the people raised the issue.”
- Rev. Bruce Wall
TAXES AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING
“I will do for America what I’ve done for Massachusetts, …”
- Michael Dukakis
U.S. News and World Report
- Was the author of the largest tax increase in the history of Massachusetts, breaking a “lead pipe guarantee” not to raise taxes
- In his first term as governor, he took Massachusetts from the 22nd to the fifth highest tax burden in the country earning his state the nickname “Taxachusetts”
- Refuses to rule out new federal taxes
- Presided over the steepest increase in any state budget in U.S. history
- Opposed all attempts in ten years to cut taxes in Massachusetts
- Wants to increase the number of IRS audits
- Opposes Balanced Budget Amendment
- Called the 1981 Reagan-Bush tax cut “one of the biggest mistakes of recent American history”
“If Dukakis is elected, he would act next year as he acted last week: trim here and there, but then take a frequent flyer to the last resort [new taxes]. He would accelerate rather than break the spending urge in Congress.”
- William Safire
New York Times
“We’ve learned that we can’t improve America’s schools by … putting religion back in the classroom. Good education requires more than a right wing and a prayer.”
- Michael Dukakis
- Opposes prayer in public schools
- Supports allowing homosexual couples to adopt children
- Supports abortion on demand
- Supports amending Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include special rights for gay men and lesbians
- Vetoed a bill which required the Pledge of Allegiance in Massachusetts public schools
“In Michael Dukakis’ America, our values are forsaken values.”
- Governor Guy Hunt
Two very different roads lie before the American people in the upcoming presidential election. The choices have never been so clear in contemporary American politics. As one noted political leader recently wrote in a Newsweek commentary: “The American people are canny enough to listen to what a man is saying instead of how he says it. The 1988 election is not about style anymore than it is about competence or breeding. It is about two starkly different visions of America and how it should be led into the 21st century.”
The issues at stake in this election go beyond the Pledge of Allegiance or who served during the Vietnam and Korean War. What is at stake is our entire value system. The challenge before the voters is to scrutinize the record of the two presidential candidates and the legacy they will leave behind.
Dukakis’ “Miracle” Economic Policies
Massachusetts Gov. Mike Dukakis is offering the nation “post-Reagan managerial competence and better-than-Bush self-confidence.“1 He cites his “Massachusetts Miracle,” the rebound of the state’s economy, as evidence of his ability to manage the federal budget. A self-styled McGovern Democrat, Dukakis is considered a technocrat who is well able to build an efficient administration.
However, his “post-Reagan managerial competence” is yet to be proven among his Bay state electorate, who have said in polls with a two to one margin that they think Dukakis has been bad for the state economy. Here are several reasons why:
- Opposition to Tax Cuts. Jack Flood, Democratic chairman of the Massachusetts State House Taxation Committee, says of Dukakis’s fiscal savvy: “The national media is portraying Dukakis as a successful implementor of economic policies. But on every important economic measure affecting the state since 1980, he lost.” 2
The measures he opposed, which voters passed were:
- Proposition 2 1/2 (40% tax cut and cap) in 1980;
- the Tax and Spending Cap in 1986;
- the 1985 repeal of his 1975 temporary 7.5% income tax surtax.
One of his advisers, Harvard Professor Ralph Whitehead, told the Boston Globe in 1986 that without Proposition 2 1/2, Massachusetts was on its way to becoming a banana republic.
Three economic measures Dukakis introduced while governor were defeated by the state legislature. “In 1985, he proposed a damaging worldwide unitary tax on corporations. The legislature defeated it. He proposed a sales tax on real estate transactions. The legislature killed it. For three years he pushed the Massbank, a big state development bank. The legislature defeated it, again and again. It’s now dead,” Flood explained.
“Dukakis says he cut taxes five times in the last four years – but all of those tax cuts were proposed by our committee … So, if Dukakis has been on the wrong side of every major economic policy issue with the voters and the legislature, would the commonwealth be better off economically today if he had won his position on all of these issues?
“Not only has this been the worst spending spree in Massachusetts history, we have almost nothing to show for it in better services. Just a bigger payroll, and a huge pension liability rising from $6 billion to $10 billion,” Flood said.
- Building Mega-Budgets at Taxpayer Expense. Since the Dukakis administration began, Massachusetts spending rose 72 percent from 1983 to 1988. Prior to his administration, there were 21 states that had higher taxes than Massachusetts. After four Dukakis years, only four states had a higher tax burden. This was after his 1974 campaign promise of no tax increases. He also converted a $1 billion surplus in fiscal 1986 to a $300 million deficit in fiscal 1988, and another $200 million in fiscal 1989 – forcing a major tax increase according to The Washington Times.3
Massachusetts debt and spending is rising faster than the nation as a whole. The Massachusetts House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Voke, a Democrat, said “My advice to the governor … is that he shouldn’t be fighting with poor people over cutting services, but cut the payroll costs. Personnel expense has risen twice as fast as expenses for the poor … State employees have gone from not being the best paid around to being better paid than comparable positions in private industry.”
Voke added that Massachusetts state employees have the second highest sick leave in the nation – almost double the national average. He explained that the current budget crisis in the Bay state was due to bad fiscal management. “There hasn’t been any will to control spending in this administration for at least five years. Every year it seems every agency comes in looking for more than the other agencies.“4
Although he campaigned on not rewarding jobs according to political patronage, the increase of contractors and consultants hired by the “03 Account” has been noted as a “flagrant abuse of this account to reward political patronage,” according to the state auditor in 1986. Since 1983, the state’s own direct payroll soared by 10,000 full-time jobs – which is the largest increase in Massachusetts history.5
Despite the budget crisis, Dukakis contends that his budgets have always been balanced compared with Reagan’s rising deficit budget. However, former Gov. Ed King, who beat Dukakis after he raised taxes, says state law requires a balanced budget. “In effect, he’s trying to take personal credit for obeying the law, and that’s dishonest.“6
Ironically, the source of Dukakis’ touted “Massachusetts Miracle,” the economic rebound during his first term, was President Reagan. Reagan’s military build-up, opposed by Dukakis, resulted in three times the national average being spent in Massachusetts, mostly on military hardware. The defense spending and research dollars resulted in the rebound.
As Boston Globe columnist David Wilson said, “The real Massachusetts Miracle may be that this activist tax-raiser didn’t prevent it from happening.” Using his “Massachusetts Miracle” as a model for his promised performance for the American people, he is not likely to tell us that analysts at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government say that recent growth in the state economy was minor – less than five percent. The Harvard study found that the economic strength of the state was partly due to growth in the high-technology sector.
Dukakis as Crusader for Gay Rights
Another very well-hidden fact about Dukakis is his support among the homosexual community – due to his lobbying on their behalf when he was a state legislator. “We have in Michael Dukakis a candidate who is instinctively supportive, who has a good record on gay rights, who wants our support and who can win,” said Jean O’Leary, executive director of National Gay Rights.7
Dukakis lobbied for a homosexual rights bill in the state House, and filed five bills on the behalf of Bill Baird, who is an abortion and homosexual rights advocate.3 The bills he introduced were:
- to repeal the law against fornication (or premarital sex);
- repeal the law punishing blasphemy;
- repeal the laws punishing unnatural and lascivious acts with another person;
- repeal the law prohibiting crime against nature (bestiality);
- repeal the law prohibiting abortions.8
He has stated that he supported passage of the Gay and Lesbian Civil Rights Law pending in Congress (H.R. 709) that would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. Last year he reassured homosexuals that he supported federal legislation banning discrimination against persons with AIDS or those with the HIV infection.
The Dukakis Record on Crime
The Dukakis prison furlough program has proven to be a political embarassment. He insists now that he inherited it from a Republican predecessor; however, during his first term he vetoed a bill to outlaw furloughs for first-degree murderers. There were an average of 388 furloughs a year to killers. Four hundred and twenty-six prisoners, including 11 first degree killers, disappeared on the furlough program according to The Wall Street Journal.9
One of these murderers, Willie Horton, was convicted of slaying a Lowell, Massachusetts, service-station attendant in 1974. Despite being cited for 11 disciplinary infractions, three of them drug-related, he was given 10 furloughs since his conviction in 1975. On the last furlough in 1987, he went to Maryland where he tied and tortured a man and raped his fiancée.10
Horton was captured and sentenced to two life terms to be served in Maryland. In explaining the sentence, the trial judge said, “With all due respect to … Massachusetts … Horton will never return there. I am not going to take the chance that he will be furloughed or released there.”
Horton became a rallying cry for Bay state protestors demanding that the program be ended. Dukakis defended the program by saying, “I think a good, strong, aggressive correctional system requires a well-managed and responsible furlough program.” After irate citizens gathered 70,000 signatures for a referendum to end furloughs for those with life sentences, with opinion polls showing the question passing by a three to one margin, and a revolt in the legislature (which passed a furlough ban by a veto-proof margin), he reluctantly signed the measure.
Staunchly against the death penalty, Dukakis vetoed a capital punishment bill during his first term and regularly testifies against the measure before legislative hearings. “I don’t think we’ve had a candidate for President so far who was against the death penalty,” said Griffin Bell, former attorney general for Jimmy Carter.
Foreign Policy: Dukakis Style
In March of 1985, while returning a toast to his Chinese Communist hosts during a visit to Canton, Michael Dukakis confessed: “I was a 13-year-old boy at the Baker School in Brookline, and I was asked to debate changes in China. I delivered a ringing condemnation of the Kuomintang and strongly advocated revolution in China. So you see, you have a friend here. In fact, some friends of President Reagan occasionally refer to Massachusetts as the People’s Republic of Massachusetts.“11
The revolution Dukakis advocated murdered millions of people and remains one of the most horrible chapters in world history. This innocent confession betrays the naiveté of Dukakis’ understanding of foreign policy. On “Meet the Press,” Dukakis told Washington Post columnist David Broder that the Monroe Doctrine had been superceded by the Pact of Rio, which obliged the U.S. not to interfere in the affairs of its neighbors.
On that basis, he said he would not assert American power unless these Soviet client states in this hemisphere introduced offensive weapons. However, the Rio Pact of 1947, first of the collective security agreements signed by the Truman Administration, did not commit the U.S. to passivity and non-intervention, as he claimed, but to mutual vigilance on the part of this country and its neighbors against the threat of aggression.
Clearly, his naiveté signals that the Soviets’ establishment of client states in the Americas would not be considered a threat to our national security by a Dukakis administration.
1 Newsweek, June 25, 1988.
2 Warren T. Brookes, “Did Dukakis Help or Hurt the Massachusetts Economy?” Human Events, August 6, 1988.
3 The Washington Times, June 6, 1988.
4 Warren T. Brookes, Human Events, June 25, 1988.
5 Human Events, May 21, 1988.
6 Conservative Digest, July 1988.
7 National Review, June 10, 1988.
8 West Roxbury Transcript, February 27, 1974.
9 The Wall Street Journal, November 19, 1988.
10 Conservative Digest, September 1988.
11 The Boston Globe, March 6, 1987.
Forerunner - Home » The Forerunner Newspaper »
Your comments are welcome!
Who is the dreaded beast of Revelation?
Now at last, a plausible candidate for this personification of evil incarnate has been identified (or re-identified). Ken Gentry’s insightful analysis of scripture and history is likely to revolutionize your understanding of the book of Revelation — and even more importantly — amplify and energize your entire Christian worldview!
Historical footage and other graphics are used to illustrate the lecture Dr. Gentry presented at the 1999 Ligonier Conference in Orlando, Florida. It is followed by a one-hour question and answer session addressing the key concerns and objections typically raised in response to his position. This presentation also features an introduction that touches on not only the confusion and controversy surrounding this issue — but just why it may well be one of the most significant issues facing the Church today.
Ideal for group meetings, personal Bible study — for anyone who wants to understand the historical context of John’s famous letter “… to the seven churches which are in Asia.” (Revelation 1:4)
Running Time: 145 minutes
$17.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“Here I stand … I can do no other!”
With these immortal words, an unknown German monk sparked a spiritual revolution that changed the world.
The dramatic classic film of Martin Luther’s life was released in theaters worldwide in the 1950s and was nominated for two Oscars. A magnificent depiction of Luther and the forces at work in the surrounding society that resulted in his historic reform efforts, this film traces Luther’s life from a guilt-burdened monk to his eventual break with the Roman Catholic Church.
Running time: 105 minutes
Special offer: Order 5 or more for $5 each.
Watch a clip from Martin Luther.
$9.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
With “preaching to the lost” being such a basic foundation of Christianity, why do many in the church seem to be apathetic on this issue of preaching in highways and byways of towns and cities?
Is it biblical to stand in the public places of the world and proclaim the gospel, regardless if people want to hear it or not?
Does the Bible really call church pastors, leaders and evangelists to proclaim the gospel in the public square as part of obedience to the Great Commission, or is public preaching something that is outdated and not applicable for our day and age?
These any many other questions are answered in this documentary.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
High Quality Paperback — 219 pages
Foundations in Biblical Orthodoxy
Driving down a country road sometime, you might see a church with a sign proudly proclaiming: “No book but the Bible — No creed but Christ.” The problem with this statement is that the word creed (from the Latin: credo) simply means “belief.” All Christians have beliefs, regardless of whether they are written.
Yet a single book containing the actual texts of the most important creeds of the early Church will not often be found. Out of the multitude of works on the evangelical Christian book market today, those dealing with the creeds of the Church are scarce.
Why Creeds and Confessions? provides a foundation of biblical orthodoxy as a defense against the false and truly heretical doctrines advanced by the spirit of this age.
$14.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)