Nevertheless, the people refused to listen to the voice of Samuel, and they said, “No, but there shall be a king over us, that we also may be like all the nations, that our king may judge us and go out before us and fight our battles” (1 Samuel 8:19,20).
Please read the following as a commentary on this election day.
Whatever happens, Jesus Christ, and not man, is king.
When Israel began to apostatize and fall away from God’s Law, they began to cry out for a tyrant, a king “like all the nations.” The prophet Samuel reminded them that they would pay the price for their idolatry in wars, tyrannical suppression and taxation, and ultimately the division of their nation into two separate entities.
Finally, the invasion of foreign pagan powers brought Israel under the enslavement of a foreign power. The slide into total apostasy began with this call for a king, so they could be “like all the nations.”
Like the children of Israel, we have a sinful tendency to clamor for “a king … like all the nations.” Then when our rulers refuse to do the job that Christ himself has ordained for the Church, we complain that they failed to do our job that we elected them to do. Our national obsession with the presidential race speaks of this idolatry. Israel ultimately paid the price and we will too if we don’t turn back to rule under God’s Law.
It is important to understand that in the beginning of America, the president did not have the power he has today. In fact, some feared that the American people would make George Washington their king. Wisely, unlike Saul, Washington refused that title and declined to serve past two terms in office. He understood that America was founded as a Republic and not a kingdom. Up until the passage of the 17th amendment, our Senators too were elected by the state legislatures. This guarded against the modern phenomenon of “career politicians,” who are always re-elected due to their ability to rob the national treasury to provide their home state with entitlements from pork barrel spending.
I agree with my Christian friends who support Romney in that he is “better” than Obama. Having said that, I have deep concerns with the Republican Party as a true alternative to liberalism.
There are some good Republicans out there. The problem is that wherever we see a Republican majority, there is rarely reform. In fact, George W. Bush expanded the national debt as a ratio to GDP more than any president so far, including even Obama. He did that with six years of Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. The Republicans used their majorities to increase funding to groups like Planned Parenthood each year. To raise funds for their re-election, they also have to take endorsements and money from all sorts of special interest groups. Once elected, they return the favor by doling out entitlements and federal social program spending for their home states – even while they decry socialism.
One of the contributing factors to this vicious cycle of corruption is that we have supposedly pro-life special interest groups, such as National Right to Life, who endorse pro-abortion candidates, such as Scott Brown of Massachusetts, whom they gave a “100 percent pro-life rating,” merely because they are the Republican frontrunners or incumbents. Many “pro-life” organizations have become enemies the sanctity of life and mere shills for the Republican Party. They believe that by delivering a voting bloc to these compromised candidates, that they have attained the status of “king-maker” and then may be able to call for political favors.
I decided long ago that a candidate must be pro-life without exception to deserve my support. The reason that I use this “litmus test” is that I find that if they are not principled on the sanctity of life, they will not be principled on any other matter. We need to set the standard and make the politicians reach for it in order to get our vote. Gone are the days when we can coronate kings and hope they will vote for the sanctity of life some of the time.
In reality, the Grand Old Party has become the enemy to true reform on every issue that truly matters. I supported John McCain in 2004. However, I think that a McCain win would have been devastating to the conservative movement. Assuming that McCain agreed with the same stimulus package that both he and Obama voted for as Senators in October of 2008, the economy would have continued to falter. Right now, we’d be looking at Democratic majorities in both houses of US Congress. We’d likely be looking today at Obama or Clinton in the White House — and what’s worse — a galvanized liberal movement.
I believe what we are seeing instead in the Obama presidency is the “death rattle” of liberal humanism. Like Soviet socialism, Obama has been promising “hope and change” (which is uncannily similar to glasnost and perestroika – “openness” and “restructuring”) as a mere slogan with no real plan for reform. That will spell the death of western humanism, but not of America itself.
Bush, McCain or Romney could never have reversed that slide because they too are socialists. But the seeds of destruction are already sown into the liberal movement in America. It is a house of cards collapsing under the weight of its own sin.
The counter reaction to the Obama presidency did more to bolster the pro-life movement than any other presidency we have seen. This has been a blessing in disguise. We also saw the Tea Party movement as a result of that. In short, we don’t need a Republican majority as much as we need a grassroots movement for true reform. The concern I have is that under six years of Republican majorities under Bush, government expanded to all time proportions. They did not stop or even slow the expansion of government, but rather increased spending to the greatest amount in history.
I have heard from many conservatives that an Obama win today will spell the death of America. They tell us that although he does not have solid conservative credentials, we need Romney to buy us a little more time. However, I have heard that same argument in every election cycle. America will not die in the next four years. Instead, the covenant-keeping Christian remnant in our culture must seize a great opportunity to rise to greater influence in a time of growing crisis.
History is full of examples of Christians who were called upon to compromise in order to retain power or else lose everything. The heroes of the faith are those who lost everything and as a result gained not only a reward in heaven, but an eventual victory for the kingdom in the earthly culture as well. For example, Athanasius’ fight was not only an ecclesiastical struggle, but a political struggle as well. The entire Roman Empire was lost to the heresy of Arianism and the only bishop who could have fought for reform was exiled because he refused to compromise. Wouldn’t it have been better for Athanasius to have stayed and compromised with the civil powers in order to continue his fight? No doubt many of today’s Christians would have encouraged him to do so.
Today, as a result of Athanasius’ stance, there is no Roman Empire. We don’t count that as a loss for the kingdom of God. Like Athanasius, we ought not to see our fight as to preserve Christian America, but as “against the world.” If we compromise with the world, we will lose America anyway, whether it is through our support of anti-Christian rulers such as Obama or Romney — or through the abdication of our responsibility to resist. The kingdom of God is among us and is advancing in the whole world. We need to work within civil politics, but we can’t think that the eventual success of Christ’s victorious kingdom hinges on the next election.
«- Countering Pro-life Idolatry
- Current Events and Issues
-» Christian Jihad – Part 5 – What is Biblical Inerrancy?
Your comments are welcome!
That Swiss Hermit Strikes Again!
Dr. Schaeffer, who was one of the most influential Christian thinkers in the twentieth century, shows that secular humanism has displaced the Judeo-Christian consensus that once defined our nation’s moral boundaries. Law, education, and medicine have all been reshaped for the worse as a consequence. America’s dominant worldview changed, Schaeffer charges, when Christians weren’t looking.
Schaeffer lists two reasons for evangelical indifference: a false concept of spirituality and fear. He calls on believers to stand against the tyranny and moral chaos that come when humanism reigns-and warns that believers may, at some point, be forced to make the hard choice between obeying God or Caesar. A Christian Manifesto is a thought-provoking and bracing Christian analysis of American culture and the obligation Christians have to engage the culture with the claims of Christ.
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
“Here I stand … I can do no other!”
With these immortal words, an unknown German monk sparked a spiritual revolution that changed the world.
The dramatic classic film of Martin Luther’s life was released in theaters worldwide in the 1950s and was nominated for two Oscars. A magnificent depiction of Luther and the forces at work in the surrounding society that resulted in his historic reform efforts, this film traces Luther’s life from a guilt-burdened monk to his eventual break with the Roman Catholic Church.
Running time: 105 minutes
Special offer: Order 5 or more for $5 each.
Watch a clip from Martin Luther.
$9.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
High Quality Paperback — 219 pages
Foundations in Biblical Orthodoxy
Driving down a country road sometime, you might see a church with a sign proudly proclaiming: “No book but the Bible — No creed but Christ.” The problem with this statement is that the word creed (from the Latin: credo) simply means “belief.” All Christians have beliefs, regardless of whether they are written.
Yet a single book containing the actual texts of the most important creeds of the early Church will not often be found. Out of the multitude of works on the evangelical Christian book market today, those dealing with the creeds of the Church are scarce.
Why Creeds and Confessions? provides a foundation of biblical orthodoxy as a defense against the false and truly heretical doctrines advanced by the spirit of this age.
$14.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the free Study Guide!
Is there a connection between pagan religion and the abortion industry?
This powerful presentation traces the biblical roots of child sacrifice and then delves into the social, political and cultural fall-out that this sin against God and crime against humanity has produced in our beleaguered society.
Conceived as a sequel and update to the 1988 classic, The Massacre of Innocence, the new title, The Abortion Matrix, is entirely fitting. It not only references abortion’s specific target – the sacred matrix where human beings are formed in the womb in the very image of God, but it also implies the existence of a conspiracy, a matrix of seemingly disparate forces that are driving this holocaust.
The occult activity surrounding the abortion industry is exposed with numerous examples. But are these just aberrations, bizarre yet anomalous examples of abortionists who just happen to have ties to modern day witchcraft? Or is this representative of something deeper, more sinister and even endemic to the entire abortion movement?
As the allusion to the film of over a decade ago suggests, the viewer may learn that things are not always as they appear to be. The Abortion Matrix reveals the reality of child-killing and strikes the proper moral chord to move hearts to fulfill the biblical responsibility to rescue those unjustly sentenced to death and to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves (Proverbs 24:11,12; 31:8,9).
Speakers include: George Grant, Peter Hammond, RC Sproul Jr., Paul Jehle, Lou Engle, Rusty Thomas, Flip Benham, Janet Porter and many more.
Ten parts, over three hours of instruction!
Running Time: 195 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)
Download the Free Study Guide!
Just what is Calvinism?
Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology?
This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer.
Running Time: 257 minutes
$19.95 — ORDER NOW!(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)