The Manhattan Declaration (Part 2) The Barmen Declaration revisited

Anyone who feels they cannot sign the Manhattan Declaration for reason that it does not go far enough, should not sign it. That being said, I personally think that those who have problems with the language of the document are reading things into it that it does not say. However, my biggest concern is that there are those who would use the controversy as an excuse for inaction. We have been called upon to act on the issue of legalized child-killing again and again and most have continued to slumber. In many ways, we are similar to the German Church in the 1930s who refused to defend the lives of the Jews.

Martin Niemöller was a German U-boat commander in WWI. He later became a Lutheran pastor and used to preach anti-Semitic sermons. He was also virulently anti-Catholic. Later he resisted Hitler and almost lost his life. He used to give speeches in America about the need for civil resistance to tyranny. He would usually end his speeches with one of several variations of the following:

In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.

At the beginning of Hitler’s administration in Nazi Germany, there was the Barmen Declaration, or The Theological Declaration of Barmen 1934. It was is a statement of the Confessing Church opposing the Nazi-supported “German-Christian” movement. This was signed by Neo-orthodox Lutheran pastors such as Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. While I disagree with Barthian theology, I would have signed the Barmen Declaration.

This is the same idea behind the Manhattan Declaration. There is a higher principle at stake here than the admittedly important theological differences that divide us.

If evangelicals do not join with Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and others who do not agree with us, to speak out against encroaching federal tyranny, there may be no one left one day to speak out for us. We must speak out in some form, no matter what our view is on the Manhattan Declaration. We must unite and redouble our efforts to speak out the evil of federal tyranny.

I knew that the Manhattan Declaration was self-consciously patterned after the Barmen Declaration, but I had never read the latter until today. This document was actually written by the neo-orthodox Karl Barth, with whom I have far more serious theological reservations than I do with former Hitlerian and Supreme Roman Pontiff, Herr Joseph Ratzinger. Ironically, I admire both of them on some levels.

Several of the Reformed luminaries, such as Duncan, Sproul, MacArthur, Piper and others, ought to get together and write an amendment to the Manhattan Declaration stating what it says and does not say that is objectionable to the Reformed position (in all the humility that the “Truly Reformed” are able to muster) and state that with these reservations in mind, the core issues of the Manhattan Declaration are agreeable to them.

Or they could write their own declaration. One could literally just rewrite the Barmen Declaration substituting “American Evangelicals” for the Germans.

Theological Declaration of Barmen

Written by Karl Barth and the confessing church in Nazi Germany in response to Hitler’s national church. Its central doctrines concern the sin of idolatry and the lordship of Christ.

I. An Appeal to the Evangelical Congregations and Christians in Germany

8.01 The Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church met in Barmen, May 29-31, 1934. Here representatives from all the German Confessional Churches met with one accord in a confession of the one Lord of the one, holy, apostolic Church. In fidelity to their Confession of Faith, members of Lutheran, Reformed, and United Churches sought a common message for the need and temptation of the Church in our day. With gratitude to God they are convinced that they have been given a common word to utter. It was not their intention to found a new Church or to form a union. For nothing was farther from their minds than the abolition of the confessional status of our Churches. Their intention was, rather, to withstand in faith and unanimity the destruction of the Confession of Faith, and thus of the Evangelical Church in Germany. In opposition to attempts to establish the unity of the German Evangelical Church by means of false doctrine, by the use of force and insincere practices, the Confessional Synod insists that the unity of the Evangelical Churches in Germany can come only from the Word of God in faith through the Holy Spirit. Thus alone is the Church renewed.

8.02 Therefore the Confessional Synod calls upon the congregations to range themselves behind it in prayer, and steadfastly to gather around those pastors and teachers who are loyal to the Confessions.

8.03 Be not deceived by loose talk, as if we meant to oppose the unity of the German nation! Do not listen to the seducers who pervert our intentions, as if we wanted to break up the unity of the German Evangelical Church or to forsake the Confessions of the Fathers!

8.04 Try the spirits whether they are of God! Prove also the words of the Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church to see whether they agree with Holy Scripture and with the Confessions of the Fathers. If you find that we are speaking contrary to Scripture, then do not listen to us! But if you find that we are taking our stand upon Scripture, then let no fear or temptation keep you from treading with us the path of faith and obedience to the Word of God, in order that God’s people be of one mind upon earth and that we in faith experience what he himself has said: “I will never leave you, nor forsake you.” Therefore, “Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.”

II. Theological Declaration Concerning the Present Situation of the German Evangelical Church


8.05 According to the opening words of its constitution of July 11, 1933, the German Evangelical Church is a federation of Confessional Churches that grew our of the Reformation and that enjoy equal rights. The theological basis for the unification of these Churches is laid down in Article 1 and Article 2 of the constitution of the German Evangelical Church that was recognized by the Reich Government on July 14, 1933:

  • Article 1. The inviolable foundation of the German Evangelical Church is the gospel of Jesus Christ as it is attested for us in Holy Scripture and brought to light again in the Confessions of the Reformation. The full powers that the Church needs for its mission are hereby determined and limited.

  • Article 2. The German Evangelical Church is divided into member Churches (Landeskirchen).

    8.06 We, the representatives of Lutheran, Reformed, and United Churches, of free synods, Church assemblies, and parish organizations united in the Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church, declare that we stand together on the ground of the German Evangelical Church as a federation of German Confessional Churches. We are bound together by the confession of the one Lord of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.

    8.07 We publicly declare before all evangelical Churches in Germany that what they hold in common in this Confession is grievously imperiled, and with it the unity of the German Evangelical Church. It is threatened by the teaching methods and actions of the ruling Church party of the “German Christians” and of the Church administration carried on by them. These have become more and more apparent during the first year of the existence of the German Evangelical Church. This threat consists in the fact that the theological basis, in which the German Evangelical Church is united, has been continually and systematically thwarted and rendered ineffective by alien principles, on the part of the leaders and spokesmen of the “German Christians” as well as on the part of the Church administration. When these principles are held to be valid, then, according to all the Confessions in force among us, the Church ceases to be the Church and the German Evangelical Church, as a federation of Confessional Churches, becomes intrinsically impossible.

    8.08 As members of Lutheran, Reformed, and United Churches we may and must speak with one voice in this matter today. Precisely because we want to be and to remain faithful to our various Confessions, we may not keep silent, since we believe that we have been given a common message to utter in a time of common need and temptation. We commend to God what this may mean for the interrelations of the Confessional Churches.

    8.09 In view of the errors of the “German Christians” of the present Reich Church government which are devastating the Church and also therefore breaking up the unity of the German Evangelical Church, we confess the following evangelical truths:

    8.10 “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.” (John 14.6). “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door, but climbs in by another way, that man is a thief and a robber. . . . I am the door; if anyone enters by me, he will be saved.” (John 10:1, 9.)

    8.11 Jesus Christ, as he is attested for us in Holy Scripture, is the one Word of God which we have to hear and which we have to trust and obey in life and in death.

    8.12 We reject the false doctrine, as though the church could and would have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and besides this one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God’s revelation.

    8.13 “Christ Jesus, whom God has made our wisdom, our righteousness and sanctification and redemption.” (1 Cor. 1:30.)

    8.14 As Jesus Christ is God’s assurance of the forgiveness of all our sins, so, in the same way and with the same seriousness he is also God’s mighty claim upon our whole life. Through him befalls us a joyful deliverance from the godless fetters of this world for a free, grateful service to his creatures.

    8.15 We reject the false doctrine, as though there were areas of our life in which we would not belong to Jesus Christ, but to other lords –- areas in which we would not need justification and sanctification through him.

    8.16 “Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body [is] joined and knit together.” (Eph. 4:15,16.)

    8.17 The Christian Church is the congregation of the brethren in which Jesus Christ acts presently as the Lord in Word and sacrament through the Holy Spirit. As the Church of pardoned sinners, it has to testify in the midst of a sinful world, with its faith as with its obedience, with its message as with its order, that it is solely his property, and that it lives and wants to live solely from his comfort and from his direction in the expectation of his appearance.

    8.18 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church were permitted to abandon the form of its message and order to its own pleasure or to changes in prevailing ideological and political convictions.

    8.19 “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great among you must be your servant.” (Matt. 20:25,26.)

    8.20 The various offices in the Church do not establish a dominion of some over the others; on the contrary, they are for the exercise of the ministry entrusted to and enjoined upon the whole congregation.

    8.21 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church, apart from this ministry, could and were permitted to give itself, or allow to be given to it, special leaders vested with ruling powers.

    8.22 “Fear God. Honor the emperor.” (1 Peter 2:17.) Scripture tells us that, in the as yet unredeemed world in which the Church also exists, the State has by divine appointment the task of providing for justice and peace. [It fulfills this task] by means of the threat and exercise of force, according to the measure of human judgment and human ability. The Church acknowledges the benefit of this divine appointment in gratitude and reverence before him. It calls to mind the Kingdom of God, God’s commandment and righteousness, and thereby the responsibility both of rulers and of the ruled. It trusts and obeys the power of the Word by which God upholds all things.

    8.23 We reject the false doctrine, as though the State, over and beyond its special commission, should and could become the single and totalitarian order of human life, thus fulfilling the Church’s vocation as well.

    8.24 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church, over and beyond its special commission, should and could appropriate the characteristics, the tasks, and the dignity of the State, thus itself becoming an organ of the State.

    8.25 “Lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age.” (Matt. 28:20.) “The word of God is not fettered.” (2 Tim. 2:9.)

    8.26 The Church’s commission, upon which its freedom is founded, consists in delivering the message of th free grace of God to all people in Christ’s stead, and therefore in the ministry of his own Word and work through sermon and sacrament.

    8.27 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church in human arrogance could place the Word and work of the Lord in the service of any arbitrarily chosen desires, purposes, and plans.

    8.28 The Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church declares that it sees in the acknowledgment of these truths and in the rejection of these errors the indispensable theological basis of the German Evangelical Church as a federation of Confessional Churches. It invites all who are able to accept its declaration to be mindful of these theological principles in their decisions in Church politics. It entreats all whom it concerns to return to the unity of faith, love, and hope.

3 Comments

Dear Jay,
I am one of those who will not sign the MD due to its ecumenical nature. I am also one who has been politically active since becoming a Christian 15 years ago. I think we who believe in the Crown Rights of Jesus Christ for our nation should write our own declaration. In fact, we should pattern it after the Solemn League and Covenant of the Scottish Covenanters.
Well good for you. I thank God for people like you, as I've repeatedly said.

My only objection to that thought is that it cannot be ecumenical in nature since the Manhattan Declaration was formulated by a group of individuals from different churches. No church or denomination was part of the committee or has endorsed it. That which is ecumenical is endorsed by the whole Church.

We don't need an ecumenical effort to make this successful. In fact, I favor a synod of Reformed churches declaring a Christian Commonwealth dependent upon God.

No one who says they believe in the WCF has actually tried to unite under it as a civil covenant since the time of the Scottish Covenanters and the Puritans -- no Reformed presbytery, denomination or group of churches or ministries has written or endorsed such a Declaration -- not even as a symbolic gesture.

If they did, there would be enough dissent among the "Truly Reformed" who would find enough problems with it in order to squelch it. In fact, as you well know, it's a small miracle that the WCF was ever formulated and signed in the first place.

In the meantime, I think it is necessary for obedient individuals to act against abortion. Many individuals have tried to write up these Declarations and have them endorsed by church denominations.

So far the response has been underwhelming. The person who came closest to leading such a movement was Francis Schaeffer. Some of his disciples have been trying for years to do the same thing, but they can never get together on one idea.

In any case, abortion will never be defeated by a group of individuals. It can only be defeated by the church.

I am persuaded that the gates of hell shall not prevail against the church alone. It could be ANY church -- even the Roman Catholic Church. Sadly, they too, with us, prove we are not truly the militant church of Christ on earth by our inaction and disobedience.

When abortion is defeated, I hope that it will be Reformed and Presbyterian churches, but so far it doesn't look like it will be.
Hi Jay,
Please forgive the delayed response... You and I are in much agreement and I pray the good LORD will unite His Church to form "a synod of Reformed churches declaring a Christian Commonwealth dependent upon God." Let us continue to pray and work toward this end while we stand at the gates of hell declaring the personhood of the preborn. :)
Your sister in Christ,
Angela Wittman
PS
Thank you for the many ways you serve our Lord and bring glory to His Name.

Your comments are welcome

Use Textile help to style your comments

Suggested products

DVD

Freedom

The Model of Christian Liberty. This DVD includes “Dawn’s Early Light: A Brief History of America’s Christian Foundations” and bonus features.

Read more

DVD

The Silent Scream

Ronald Reagan changed his view as a result of watching The Silent Scream – a movie he considered so powerful and convicting that he screened it at the White House.

Read more